Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/06/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Terrible quality, SVG at File:Flag of Ecuador.svg Fry1989 eh? 00:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Terrible quality, SVG at File:Flag of Ecuador.svg Fry1989 eh? 00:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Not own work by Mingle Media TV per EXIF and description (DISNEY CHANNEL/TODD WAWRYCHUK) Morning Sunshine (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: accidentally released as free I assume Denniss (talk) 00:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adam Irigoyen, Roshon Fegan, Zendaya 2011.jpg Morning Sunshine (talk) 00:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: accidentally released as free I assume Denniss (talk) 00:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Banner of the Qulla Suyu.svg Fry1989 eh? 00:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
fake license: googlong on Examiner, for ex: http://www.examiner.com/article/andrew-scott-and-the-rachel-papers Forwhomthebelltolls (talk) 01:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused photo of unknown person - out of project scope. Also doubtful authorship - photo look like as rephotographed or scanned work of another author, low resolution. Art-top (talk) 03:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 04:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: ou of scope Wvk (talk) 06:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 04:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Refineria2.jpg Barranqueño 19:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Refineria.jpg Barranqueño 18:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Escudo_del_Municipio.jpg Barranqueño 19:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work. Art-top (talk) 08:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Copyvio: [1]. --Art-top (talk) 08:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also doubtful authorsip:
- File:Innovation & Technology Centre.jpg
- File:Bletchley Campus.jpg
- File:Chaffron Way Campus.jpg
- File:MK COLLEGE Logo 314.tiff
- --Art-top (talk) 08:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
User requested deletion by blanking all his pages and changing licence to {{Copyvio}}. Obviously, user released these images freely, so not a copyvio. Thus I have converted to DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Close Changed my mind. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 16:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Ira furor brevis est PierreSelim (talk) 19:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Flickr copyright violation: © getty - AFP http://www.sat1.de/tv/fruehstuecksfernsehen/bilder/galerie-katy-perry High Contrast (talk) 20:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Abusive flickrwashing by user CPGirlAJ. flickr upload 5 minutes before the upload to Commons. Martin H. (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Flickr copyright violation: Credit: John Shearer/WireImage http://www.people.com/people/news/category/0,,20430288,00.html High Contrast (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, abusive flickrwashing by user CPGirlAJ. Martin H. (talk) 20:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I think it is bad licensed, PD? source Google.com and author The Factor USA isn't PD Ezarateesteban 21:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation, unfree image grabbed from google imagesearch Martin H. (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
File to be replaced by Léon Printemps Dia73 Cecil H (talk) 15:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
There is no added value by maintaining this file. The same topic is on its replacement - File Léon Printemps Dia73.jpg Cecil H (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/All files in Category:Léon Printemps Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Oddly named (slanderous?) personal photo lacking any sort of encyclopedic description or usefulness. – JBarta (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Trijnsteltalk 02:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
unused private photo out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
unused private photo out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 09:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Larry the Twitter bird is not a simple geometric shape, I don't see how this can be classified as public domain under that rationale. Kelapstick (talk) 01:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - I came to nominate this for deletion for exactly the same reason as Kelapstick; he just beat me to it. LadyofShalott (talk) 01:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Move up to Wikipedia and then delete. Fry1989 eh? 02:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Move and delete, yes. As I was saying on File talk:Twitter 2012 logo.svg, I was also surprised to see it here. Nclm (talk) 07:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Strong and speedy delete Sure looks like a copyvio. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 16:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- So much that I have flagged it as a copyvio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C3F2k (talk • contribs)
- Don't do that for images with open deletion discussion already underway, thanks. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Not a simple geometric shape. Not PD for any other reason. And I strongly doubt User:Quickliger is the actual author. I would support speedy deletion; seems like a clear case of copyviol to me. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Ices2Csharp (talk) 16:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Thats the new official logo and it's new name it's "twitter" not Larry as it was previously. Do NOT delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.161.212 (talk • contribs)
- Confirming that this is the new official Twitter logo means that this MUST be deleted from Commons, since it is property of Twitter and not an original free licensed work. -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted Seems a clear case by everyone looking at it from the copyright standpoint. While some logos (such as Twitter's simple letter "t") can fall under PD-text-logo, this bird design clearly does not. "Fair use" of copyrighted material is not allowed on Commons. -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
This stylized bird is a work of art. It is not merely geometric shapes, and thus can not be assumed to be in the public domain. LadyofShalott (talk) 03:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I must have missed it when I listed File:Twitter 2010 logo.svg and File:Twitter 2012 logo.svg, but the same rationale applies. --Kelapstick (talk) 03:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted Clear case -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free content (book cover) Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Ralgistalk 19:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete All the book images are copyrighted. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete --Alex T. (talk) 05:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Halganayh.jpg Mys 721tx (talk) 10:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sam Zarajsky (talk · contribs)
editout of scope, (c) watermark
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Teatr subbota (talk · contribs)
editunknown people, undisclosed theater, permission/author questionable. oh: also out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 06:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Atardecer_Rio_Magdalena_Puente.jpg Barranqueño 19:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Atardecer_Rio_Magdalena_Puente.jpg Barranqueño 19:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - look like as video frame, not own work. Art-top (talk) 03:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 06:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 03:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted, from lameuse.be, published almost two years before upload to commons. Thuresson (talk) 07:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 04:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 06:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif, probably a fragment of a video frame. Art-top (talk) 04:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 07:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Watermarked image. Clear copyright infringement. Dismas (talk) 04:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 07:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Watermarked image. Clear copyright infringement. Dismas (talk) 04:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 07:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Watermarked image. Clear copyright infringement. Dismas (talk) 04:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 07:44, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Watermarked image. Clear copyright infringement. Dismas (talk) 04:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
No good faith here. All other uploads by user have been copyright infringements. This is the only image that hasn't been watermarked. Subject is in the image, so how is it their own work? Dismas (talk) 04:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted, from blogspot.com. Thuresson (talk) 07:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Watermarked image. Copyright infringement likely due to other uploads by user. User has not established that they are in fact Lexi Love. Nor that she/they own the rights to their images. Dismas (talk) 04:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 07:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 08:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 07:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 07:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 07:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 09:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
No verifiable source information and no authorship information to substantiate the claim that this photo is in the public domain. The uploader blanked out the {{No source since}} problem tag without addressing the problem. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- The uploader added a Library of Congress source (and blanked out the tag pointing to this discussion in spite of its clear instruction not to do so). The source does not name an author to confirm the claim that the author died more than 70 years ago, and there is no date of publication (only creation) to otherwise establish public domain status. US works by unknown artists created in 1924 and published after 2002 are copyrighted through 2044. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
This photo has a corporate author (National Photo Company) and is more than 70 years old. The original dated negative is in the collection of the Library of Congress. The Library of Congress website also states that there are “no known restrictions on publication”. The website is Library of Congress
Wmpearl (talk) 18:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- When was it first published? —LX (talk, contribs) 19:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- "[19]24 August 7." [2] "The National Photo Company Collection documents virtually all aspects of Washington, D.C., life. During the administrations of Presidents Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover, the National Photo Company supplied photographs of current news events in Washington, D.C., as a daily service to its subscribers." [3] PD not renewed; i.e. they would have had to renew their copyright, but instead donated their photo archive in 1947. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- keep license updated per loc "no known restrictions on the photographs in the National Photo Company Collection." [4] Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 04:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept, withdrawn. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Larry the Twitter bird is not a simple geometric shape, I don't see how this logo with his inclusion can be classified as public domain under that rationale. Kelapstick (talk) 01:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - that stylized bird is an artwork, not a simple geometric shape. LadyofShalott (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Move up to Wikipedia and then delete. Fry1989 eh? 02:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- It was tagged for "Move to Commons" on enwiki, so I moved. Delete if there is no valid license. Thanks -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 07:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete this, it isn't official logo, this old logo is all blue in Twitter brand identity guide. Motisances (talk) 21:06, 15 juin 2012 (CEST)
- Since this is being used in the article, please don't delete it until it has been moved back to Wikipedia.--Ianmacm (talk) 19:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
unused image of an unknown band - out of scope (looks like a school band, nearly) Cholo 3 (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Probably a Spanish rock band. At Spanish Wikipedia the article Third Version has been deleted several times. Thuresson (talk) 07:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private drawing - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 07:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 07:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused, dubious educational use. Art-top (talk) 08:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Dubious educational use. Art-top (talk) 08:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
wrong name, replaced by file:Städtisches Lapidarium Stuttgart, Nr. Nummernzeichen006.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 08:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: exact duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
wrong name, replaced by file:Städtisches Lapidarium Stuttgart, Nr. Nummernzeichen018, 1.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: exact duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
wrong name, replaced by file:Städtisches Lapidarium Stuttgart, Nr. Nummernzeichen018, 2.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: exact duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
wrong name, replaced by file:Städtisches Lapidarium Stuttgart, Nr. Nummernzeichen019, 1.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 08:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: exact duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
wrong name, replaced by file:Städtisches Lapidarium Stuttgart, Nr. Nummernzeichen020, 1.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 08:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: exact duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Fuck Kyle, A famous phrase from the well known gaming podcast created by WoodysGamertag and WingsOfRedemption.png
edit
No apparent educational use. Seems to be an advertisement to sell T-shirts more than anything else. – JBarta (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Herby talk thyme 11:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
poor quality unused personal image. Out of project scope. Uploader requested deletion with OTRS ticket 2012061110008214 QU TalkQu 13:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private file storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This low quality image is unused and there are many superior alternatives in Category:Tyrosine. ChemNerd (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 13:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Unidentified person, so presumably out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 18:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. Ices2Csharp (talk) 23:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a minor. Unused. Trijnsteltalk 23:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Unless the uploader is going to use it on his user page, as it may be of himself. Senator2029║talk 10:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nomination --Ras67 (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a minor. Unused. Trijnsteltalk 23:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Unless the uploader is going to use it on his user page, as it may be of himself. Senator2029║talk 10:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nomination --Ras67 (talk) 19:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 23:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 23:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
this is a derivative work of a logo created circa 2003 Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No proof that this is licenses with a Creative Commons license and it is not PD-ineligible. MGA73 (talk) 13:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Un Poco Pendejo (talk · contribs)
editunused personal photo, out of project scope
Trex2001 (talk) 08:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rana Kamran Iqbal (talk · contribs)
editAll are out of scope. This is not where Commons and Wikipedia is meant for. Non-notable person.
- File:Rana Kamran pic in Hostel.jpg
- File:Rana Kamran Iqbal with his car.jpg
- File:Rana kamran pic on uni canteen.jpg
- File:Rana Kamran Iqbal pic with cazan in Lahore.jpg
- File:Rana Kamran Iqbal pic in universty.jpg
- File:Rana Kamran pics in tour Lahore.jpg
- File:Rana Kamran Iqbal pic with friends.jpg
- File:Rana Kamran Iqbal pic in Lahore.jpg
- File:Rana Kamran in Lahore.jpg
Trijnsteltalk 23:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. Chesdovi (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Is this really okay for {{PD-textlogo}}? While the text would be okay per se, what about the fairly elaborate background? Decltype (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: The background is in shades of beige, with no distinguishable shape or form, such background isn't elaborate or eligible for any type of copyright. Xeworlebi (t•c) 12:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Xeworlebi, the shades of the background is nothing that copyright can be claimed for. -- Neozoon (talk) 22:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
This image is licensed claiming it "only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text". This is inaccurate, as the background image and possibly the beveling should easily meet the threshold of originality. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Same deletion rationale as above. --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Kept. I'm closing this early. Unless there are new issues raised, we all have better things to do than debate the same image twice in five weeks. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
I must concur with previous DRs, this is not in any way PD-SIMPLE or PD-TEXTLOGO. The background is undeniably complex - if it were without text, we'd easily accept it was copyrighted. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Very complex. I think the previous DRs resulting in the file being kept won't change it. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 18:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- And it is also possible a court could rule this to be copyrightable because of the 3D letters and the background, and thus I think we need to delete the image per COM:PRP. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?)
Delete As per my 2010 nomination, adding that it would be prudent to err on the side of caution in cases where reasonable doubt exists that an image meets {{PD-textlogo}}. decltype (talk) 11:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Maybe we've all become more precautionary in the last couple of years, but I agree that this shows artistry beyond the TOO. --99of9 (talk) 07:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
images by "Woody World Co.Ltd.", no permission
- File:Kerd&Woody.jpg
- File:Gaga Thailand & Woody.jpg
- File:Talk-About Guy 2011 M Thai.jpg
- File:Most talk about guy 2011.jpg
- File:พระมหาสมปองและวู้ดดี้.jpg
- File:พระมหาสมปองกับวู้ดดี้.jpg
- File:Logo Woody Company.jpg
- File:เป้ อารักษ์ & วู้ดดี้.jpg
- File:Mr.Woody.jpg
- File:Woody World Company Logo.jpg
- File:WoodyTalk with Jane Yanthip.JPG
- File:WoodyTalk with Ananda.JPG
- File:WoodyTalk with Chompoo & Aff.JPG
- File:WoodyTalk with Pancake.JPG
Polarlys (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Just a thought... - I'm thinking Logo Woody Company.jpg is simple enough to be PD-textlogo. – JBarta (talk) 09:07, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete all (with possible exception on the logo - neutral on that.) Tagged as lacking permission for over seven days. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: all except the logo pr nom. JuTa 05:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 颐园新居 as Speedy (过小的低质量或低分辨率的文件,请求删除) Sreejith K (talk) 09:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason given Denniss (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Both, the original version as well as the version uploaded in the mean time look like copyright violations: Small, no EXIF. The original version looks like a screen capture. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 颐园新居 as Speedy (上传文件有误已上传其他质量更好类似的图片,作者请求删除) Sreejith K (talk) 09:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason given Denniss (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 颐园新居 as Speedy (上传文件有误已上传其他质量更好类似的图片,作者请求删除) Sreejith K (talk) 09:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason given Denniss (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Painting by Olof Andersson (1884-1952) not in public domain and certainly not authored by User:Iin208. /Esquilo (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Bilden jag tagit är ett foto av min egen tavla. En tavla i privat ägo. /Iin208
- Even if you own the painting, you still don't hold the copyright. /Esquilo (talk) 05:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Much better version is here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo_15_flag,_rover,_LM,_Irwin.jpg . No need to keep this one with a) worse quality b) bad source info c) bad author info d) bad image description 92.74.142.206 17:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also e) wrong date and f) wrong status tag. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. Lesser quality version of the other file already hosted on Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. A far better alternative exists High Contrast (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 07:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused private photo - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 07:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution makes me wonder whether own work is true. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Looks awfully complex. Doesn't look like {{PD-textlogo}} at all. Stefan4 (talk) 01:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio? Edgars2007 (talk) 05:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
this is a derivative work and there is no freedom of panorama in the US Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
wrong name, replaced by file:Städtisches Lapidarium Stuttgart, Nr. A195.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
wrong name, replaced by file:Städtisches Lapidarium Stuttgart, Nr. A194.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 07:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:48, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - site name on picture. Art-top (talk) 07:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolution for own work, no original exif. Art-top (talk) 08:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Fichier redondant non utilisable sur la page correspondante de wikipedia. JPRoger (talk) 10:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Insufficient information to support the claim that the author has been dead for more than 70 years. (en:Fred A. Precht indicates that he was still active in 1930.) —LX (talk, contribs) 10:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Insufficient information to support the claim that the author has been dead for more than 70 years. (en:Fred A. Precht indicates that he was still active in 1930.) —LX (talk, contribs) 10:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Artwork by Marcel Gaumont (1880-1962), not in public domain. No FoP in France. 83.204.212.217 11:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately has to be deleted due to the lack of Freedom of Panorama in Russia. This is a post-1945 monument. Ymblanter (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Looks old, so maybe not own work. Might be PD but impossible to tell without more information. Stefan4 (talk) 13:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
en:File:Thaing3.jpg has a different licence. No evidence of permission from the source web site. Stefan4 (talk) 13:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Possibly copyvio, see en:File:Vic crest.png. Stefan4 (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:58, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No licence specified at source. Stefan4 (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
3D modern piece of art should be protected by copyright. Clearly on display as being a form of art. Though the piece of art is suppose to be furniture, and furniture isn't protected by copyright. Vera (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Per the decision at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Falling hare bugs.jpg, these should be deleted as derivative works of Bugs Bunny. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 17:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Modern work of art (Terje Roalkvam - 2005) and located inside a museum, thereby hardly covered by any freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Some of these might be copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 21:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
2d photo of a 3d work of art of a copyrighted character of a design within the last few years (no earlier than 2008-2009). Well beyond de minimis usage. Masem (talk) 22:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. This is a statue of a man who died in 1969, so the statue is likely recent. Year of death of the sculptor unknown. Stefan4 (talk) 23:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. 2003 statue according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. 2003 statue according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Made in 1954 according to English Wikipedia, so at least copyrighted in the United States thanks to COM:URAA. Copyright status in the Philippines unclear since the sculptor is unidentified. Stefan4 (talk) 23:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Made in 2003 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:50, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Made in 2002 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Made in 2004 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Made in 1966 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Made in 1976 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Made in 1978 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. {{PD-US}} 95 years after 1933. {{PD-Philippines}} 50 years after 1976. Sculptor: tl:Guillermo Tolentino. Stefan4 (talk) 23:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. Sculptor is en:Napoleon Abueva who appears to be alive. Can be undeleted 50 years after his death. Stefan4 (talk) 23:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. From 1978 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. From 1958 according to English Wikipedia. {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} if nothing else. Stefan4 (talk) 23:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines. From 1993 according to English Wikipedia. Stefan4 (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Fuzzy image, replacement has been used on en-Wiki pages (File:Tony Martin 2010.jpg) Ronhjones (Talk) 23:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Insufficient information to support the claim that the author has been dead for more than 70 years. (en:Fred A. Precht indicates that he was still active in 1930.) —LX (talk, contribs) 10:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:IPC logo (2004).svg Fry1989 eh? 21:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Colours on the SVG are a very poor match, and the International Paralympic Committee have stated that at OTRS 2012061810009184Ronhjones (Talk) 19:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)- IPC have supplied an updated SVG file with the correct colours - so this one is redundant Ronhjones (Talk) 19:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Presidentman (talk · contribs) Wikipedia Random Picture of the Day 18:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope: Inferior near-duplicate, unused. 99of9 (talk) 23:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
It says that the "Picture should have been taken around 1936". German photos taken in 1926 or later are copyrighted in the United States, see COM:URAA. They may thus not be uploaded to Commons. Stefan4 (talk) 10:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, just delete it. The reason I uploaded it in Commons was because the picture was originally a candidate from en.wikipedia to be moved to commons, so that it can be used in other wikipedia projects. The source, and the picture that is uploaded to commons by me is an exact of the one in en.wikipedia. But then as I checked the Josef_Mengele.jpg from en.wikipedia just now, the status is changed. I can see no more suggestion for it to be copied here. So it is up to you and the rest of the users to do the next appropriate action. I give my green light to delete it but then you can see much more tags in en.wikipedia regarding the same pictures Josef_Mengele.jpg. Maryline Anak Martine (talk) 05:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note that English Wikipedia's requests about moving images to Commons often are applied automatically: if the file information page indicates a licence which is compatible with Commons, then the file is flagged for moving to Commons. However, the person moving the file still needs to verify that the licence claim is correct. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
This is not a simple photograph, rather an artistic one. It is non-free in Italy until 2014. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful authorship - low resolition photo without original exif. Art-top (talk) 07:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also: File:362652-yvon-michel.jpg (the same "author"). --Art-top (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
and: File:Head shot curl snake.jpg (same issue, same uploader).
"Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 licence" at source. That is a different license than the one provided on the file page AND this license is not allowed on Commons since it restricts commercial use and does not allow derivative works. Saibo (Δ∇) 12:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Seems pretty clear-cut - the original license is not Commons-compatible. sısɐuuǝɔıʌ∀ (diskuto) 13:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
copyviol from television program Threecharlie (talk) 20:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I can't see a logo of a television broadcaster, but you need one of those TV cameras for a shot (npi) like this. --El Grafo (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
No doubt some of these are copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 21:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete Just to add to the reasons for deletion, I doubt this was a self-made work as the uploader claimed. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 21:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. MBisanz talk 01:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. The photograph was published already on 08/10/2008 [5] . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- And in 07-12-2007 [6] Imagem - ilha de S. Simon ria de Vigo (C) Javi
- And in 16-04-2008 [7]
- And in 12-08-2009 [8]
- And in 25-06-2009 [9]
- (It was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons in 26-05-2010)--. HombreDHojalata.talk 22:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
newly uploaded and completely unsourced, useless for an educational purpose Antemister (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sources are on en:List of smoking bans. BartekChom (talk) 13:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 02:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- I created this image, I noticed that the old image was outdated and much more complicated to understand, as it had about 5 or 6 colour-coding. I updated it based on the en:List of smoking bans page which lists the ban for every country. I think it is not useless as it is a much more understandable point of reference. --Philip200291 (talk) 17:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete this map had good intentions but falls short of representing the actual situation in each country. You really would need a rainbow of colours to account accurately for the wide range of possibilities. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 21:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 05:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fresh Hare
editThe character Bugs Bunny is a derivative work of the film A Wild Hare (1940, R434265). Cf. the similar Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Mickey Mouse.jpg. It is either necessary to edit out Bugs Bunny from all of the images or delete the images.
- File:Bugs Bunny - Fresh Hare ( any 1942) amb calçotets.JPG
- File:Bugs Bunny - Fresh Hare ( any 1942).JPG
- File:Fresh Hare title.JPG
- File:Fresh Hare.JPG
- File:Fresh Hare.ogv
- File:Merrie melodies bugs.JPG
_amb_cal%C3%A7otets.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 02:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Some of the image were in a previous batch deletion request, Commons:Deletion requests/Cartoons. -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. At least in this file doesn't appear any trademarked character (a snow-bunny isn't Bugs Bunny, the character is not recognisible) and the blackfaces here despicted neither looks really to Elmer Fudd or Bugs Bunny.--Coentor (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Hello to all. OK, everyone knows that the aforementioned image is PD. The main problem, as of the incomming mass deletion of PD images with well-known character in it, is that some character may be still (USA) copyrighted. Do look for Commons:Undeletion_requests#Falling_hare_bugs.jpg discussion : it ends up with deletion in accordance with this pdf [10]. According to it, AVELA made a copyright infringement using modified images for placement on retail products. Is this case apply to every image/file with a character in it ? I don't think so. Is somebody here a real established lawyer ? Mr Godwin from Wikimedia is, and believes that this kind of images should be OK. Yes, a warning that states something like "Don't make missuses of this file/image, according to the laws in USA" would be great on the relevant page.
- File:JAL Dream Express-vertical stabilizer jpg pixelated.png contains copyrighted logotypes (yes, the JAL and UNICEF ones !). I believe that anyone who extract one of them and claim this is his property will be prosecuted. Though, there is no warning or disclaimer laid on the page.
-
- Um, no, you are misunderstanding Commons:Undeletion requests#File:Falling hare bugs.jpg. The court concluded that using unmodified copies also violates the copyright, although there seemed to be some permission from Warner Brothers to use unmodified copies (at least for specific uses). However, this permission would at best grant a {{Nonderivative}} licence, and as you can see, the {{Nonderivative}} template is a speedy deletion template. I think that there was some lawsuit in Japan which says something about whether you may take photos of vehicles displaying copyrighted works, although I don't remember the outcome. You would have to refer to that lawsuit for the other image. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Delete What the courts said is that all of the files listed in this DR are derivative works of more technically this screenshot, which marked the first appearance of Bugs Bunny. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 02:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- This File shouldn't de deleted, because not a single trademarked character appears on it.--Coentor (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Isn't that rabbit supposed to be Bugs Bunny? --Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. The snow-rabbit in the film's title card is definitely intended to represent Bugs Bunny. - Seth Allen (discussion/contributions), Saturday, August 25, 2012, 17:20 UTC.
- I disagree. It can be intended to represent Bugs Bunny, or could be a similar character. Either, it can also just be a bunny-like snowman. I mean, it's just a Screenshot of a Snow Rabbit in a Bugs Bunny movie. It's not necessarily BB, as it's not refered to be BB in the whole cartoon.--Coentor (talk) 07:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. The snow-rabbit in the film's title card is definitely intended to represent Bugs Bunny. - Seth Allen (discussion/contributions), Saturday, August 25, 2012, 17:20 UTC.
- Isn't that rabbit supposed to be Bugs Bunny? --Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- This File shouldn't de deleted, because not a single trademarked character appears on it.--Coentor (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all, and then undelete the images in 2036 along with all of the other derivatives of the Bugs Bunny character that were previously deleted from Commons, which I have listed together in a single section at Category:Undelete in 2036. Their presence constitutes ambiguous violation of Warner Bros.' copyright on the Bugs Bunny character design. In any version —be it the Ben Hardaway-created prototype, the Tex Avery-created design from the rabbit's official debut films, or the final, commercially current design introduced by Robert McKimson— Bugs is still a copyrighted character himself, even though some of his early films (i.e., Fresh Hare, Falling Hare, and various others) have fallen into the public domain, and yet, even when his copyright does expire, trademark restrictions on the character will still apply, as long as he is commercially being used by Warners, whether as a mascot or otherwise. Taking all of that into account, I request that all of these images be deleted as soon as possible. - Seth Allen (discussion/contributions), Saturday, August 25, 2012, 17:20 UTC.
- Comment It would be a great mistake to delete ALL file! this, this and this one are completly free images because are screenshots taken from a PD movie with no registered characters on it.--Coentor (talk) 12:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Bugs Bunny is apparently copyrighted until 2036. FASTILYs (TALK) 02:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Knuckles by AMK (talk · contribs)
editAdvertisement/promotional. Keep a couple and re-write description so it doesn't sound like an advertisement.
- File:Black Widow Brass Knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Pay Up Brass Knuckles by American Made Knuckles.jpg
- File:Inferno Brass Knuckle by American Made Knuckles.jpg
- File:Spade Brass Knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Wicked Brass Knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Slayer Brass Knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Crown Brass Knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Spade-One brass knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Maltese-Two Brass Knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Spade-Two brass knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Lucky13-Two Brass Knuckles by AMK.jpg
- File:Pay Up-One by American Made Knuckles.jpg
- File:Clover-Two by American Made Knuckles.jpg
- File:Pay Up-Two by American Made Knuckles.jpg
- File:2-Spades by American Made Knuckles.jpg
- File:Lucky13 by American Made Knuckles.jpg
- File:Hellfire by American Made Knuckles.jpg
– JBarta (talk) 04:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Mativet
editPictures of a non-notable individual: the corresponding WP fr: article has been deleted. They have no educational use that I can see, plus several of them have permission problems: they are pics *of* François Mativet, not taken by him.
- File:Paramé 1955 01.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1953 Noël.jpg
- File:St Etienne en Coglès Mativet u.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1953.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1950.jpg
- File:Mativet 1951 St Etienne.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1951 Joinville 03.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1982.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet St Etienne en Coglès.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1951 Joinville 02.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1995.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1968 Saint Maur des Fossés.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet friends 1974 London ter.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1998 Creuse.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1972 Ménil Palace.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1997 Montel.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1976 au soleil.jpg
- File:St Etienne en Coglès Mativet ter 01.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1978 Saint Maur.jpg
- File:St Etienne en Coglès Mativet ter.jpg
- File:Cabourg 1957 Mativet ter.jpg
- File:Rotheneuf 1956a.jpg
- File:François Mativet 1958 Versailles.jpg
- File:Paramé 1955.jpg
- File:Rochebonne 1958 02.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo 1956b.jpg
- File:Mativet Dinard 1958 02.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1967 01.jpg
- File:La Varenne 1957.jpg
- File:Joinville Mardi Gras.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1985 Petit Beaubourg.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet Joinville velo 01.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1996 guitare yamaha.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1968 Montel de Gelat 02.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1968 St Maur 02.jpg
- File:Joinville 1951.jpg
- File:The Smarties 1967 Joinville.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1969.jpg
- File:François Mativet 1958 Saint Malo.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1973 Lard Free.jpg
- File:Francois 1968 pl auvergne.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet London.jpg
- File:François 1968 Puy Labade.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1975.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1964a.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1977.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1970 Lard Free.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1980 François Mativet.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1972.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1971b.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1976.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1994.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1973b.jpg
- File:Montel 1971a.jpg
- File:Vacances 1978.jpg
- File:St Martin de Bréhal 1977.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1973a.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1973 01.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1974.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1973.jpg
- File:Montel 1973.jpg
- File:Montel 1971.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1974 François Mativet 01.jpg
- File:François Mativet novembre a.jpg
- File:Saint Pierre Caen.jpg
- File:Mont-Saint-Michel 1959.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1975 Guitare a.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1971a.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1974 London ter.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1975 Guitare.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet Paris 1967a.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1985 François Mativet.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1968 François Mativet bis.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1974 François Mativet.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1977 Bréhal bis.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1977 Bréhal.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1998 bis.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1977 François Mativet.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 04 bis.jpg
- File:François Mativet lf.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet Joinville velo.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1974 London 01.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet friends 1974 London bis.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1972 François Mativet.jpg
- File:François Mativet notes.jpg
- File:Saint Malo 1958a.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet Montel 1967.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1998.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1997.jpg
- File:Mativet Deauville 04.jpg
- File:Mativet Deauville 03.jpg
- File:Mativet Deauville 02.jpg
- File:Mativet Deauville 01.jpg
- File:Tour de l'ouest Saint-Malo s.jpg
- File:François Mativet m.jpg
- File:François Mativet mardi gras.jpg
- File:François Mativet not.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet Joinville ter.jpg
- File:François Mativet novembre.jpg
- File:François Mativet noel.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 07 ter.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 07 bis.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet Joinville bis.jpg
- File:Mativet Trouville Deauville bis.jpg
- File:Mativet Trouville Deauville.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 07.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 06.jpg
- File:Mativet Saint Cast.jpg
- File:St Etienne en Coglès Mativet.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1974 london bis.jpg
- File:François Mativet l Joinville.jpg
- File:Cabourg 1957 Mativet bis.jpg
- File:Ouistreham 1957 03.jpg
- File:Ouistreham 1957 02.jpg
- File:Ouistreham 1957 01.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 05.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 04.jpg
- File:François Mativet les bords de Marne.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 03.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 02.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 01.jpg
- File:Mativet Trouville 1950 01.jpg
- File:Mativet Trouville 1950 ter.jpg
- File:St Maur 1972.jpg
- File:St Maur 1972 bis.jpg
- File:Seventies Paris.jpg
- File:Seventies Paris bis.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo 1956 01.jpg
- File:Rotheneuf 1956.jpg
- File:Rotheneuf 1956 bis.jpg
- File:Saint Jacut 1953.jpg
- File:Saint Jacut 1953 bis.jpg
- File:Etang de Chancelade 1965.jpg
- File:Etang de Chancelade 1950.jpg
- File:Puy Labade 1972.jpg
- File:Puy Labade 1972 bis.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 1972.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 1972 bis.jpg
- File:Mativet Trouville 1950.jpg
- File:Mativet Trouville 1950 bis.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo 1956 bis.jpg
- File:Etang de Chancelade 1956.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1964.jpg
- File:Mativet Dinard 1958.jpg
- File:Rochebonne 1956 bis.jpg
- File:Etang de Chancelade 1955.jpg
- File:Etang de Chancelade 1955 bis.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1965 Chancelade.jpg
- File:Saint Maur 1968 François Mativet.jpg
- File:Cabourg 1957 Mativet.jpg
- File:François Mativet Simca Ariane.jpg
- File:Rochebonne 1956.jpg
- File:Saint Malo 1958.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo 1956.jpg
- File:François Mativet Joinville.jpg
- File:Tour de l'ouest Rochebonne.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1956 Saint Malo.jpg
- File:Rochebonne 1955.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1997 Supernatural Fairy Tales.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1967.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1981 Saint Maur.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1981 Saint Maur.tif
- File:Francois Mativet été 1996 Auvergne.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1977 M.J.C Clermont.jpg
- File:Francois Mativet 1971.jpg
Have been excluded from this mass DR pics that actually had an educational value such as File:Chateau Caen 1966.jpg and pics about rock group Category:Lard Free of which Mativet was a member: the group has a WP article (fr:Lard Free). The Lard Free pics also have permission issues, but the mass request is already big enough as it is. In short, I'm asking only for the deletion of family/private pictures from this user. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Einige, nicht verwendete private Fotos, hochgeladen 2009 und 2010. Das älteste von 1939 File:Saint Etienne en Coglès 01.jpg kann eventuell per PD-old-70 behalten werden. Als Quelle ist bei vielen "lard free" angegeben. Dieser ist vermutlich identisch mit dem Hochlader, siehe Dateibeschreibung von File:Lard Free Evry 1972a.jpg. Bei anderen Fotos sind als Quellen andre mativet oder family archive angegeben. Genutzt werden folgende Bilder: File:Tour de l'ouest Saint-Malo r passage des coureurs.jpg (Quelle: andre mativet) und File:Rotheneuf 1956 ter.jpg (Quelle: family archive).
- File:Lard Free Montreuil session 1971.jpg
- File:Ampli Marshall.jpg
- File:Lard Free 1973 Vamp 01.jpg
- File:Lard Free 1972 Ménil Palace.jpg
- File:Lard Free 1971 Pop 2.jpg
- File:Lard Free Evry 1972b.jpg
- File:Philippe Bolliet Lard Free 1972a.jpg
- File:Lard Free 1972 Gibus Club.jpg
- File:Lard Free 1972 L.jpg
- File:L Francois Mativet 1960.jpg
- File:Saint-Malo 1956a.jpg
- File:Lard Free 1972.jpg
- File:Lard Free Evry 1972a.jpg
- File:Tour de l'ouest Saint-Malo r passage des coureurs.jpg
- File:St Etienne en Coglès Mativet bis.jpg
- File:Rotheneuf 1956 ter.jpg
- File:Rochebonne 1958 01.jpg
- File:Saint Etienne en Coglès 02.jpg
- File:Saint Etienne en Coglès 01.jpg
- File:Bords de Marne Joinville le Pont 03.jpg
- File:Mativet Auvergne 08.jpg
- File:Jean Jacques Miette Lard Free 1971.jpg
- File:Lard Free Ford 1972 bis.jpg
- File:Lard Free Miette.jpg
- File:Saint Malo 1958 01.jpg
- File:Lard Free Evry 1972.jpg
- File:Lard Free Bievres 1972.jpg
- File:Saint Malo 1958 bis.jpg
- File:Jacky Chantrier Les Noctambules.jpg
- File:Tour de l'ouest Saint-Malo caravane publicitaire.jpg
- File:Tour de l'ouest Saint-Malo caravane publicitaire ter.jpg
- File:Tour de l'ouest Saint-Malo caravane publicitaire bis.jpg
- File:Defilé breton Saint-Malo trois.jpg
- File:Defilé breton Saint-Malo plus.jpg
- File:Defilé breton Saint-Malo deux.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 10:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Hystrix: (or anyone else) can you provide an explanation in English (or French) ? Some of these photos are used on FR.wikipedia, so they have an educationnal value. --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 11:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- @XIIIfromTOKYO: Danke für Deine Nachfrage. Ich versuche immer, meine muttersprachlichen Beiträge per google translator zu übersetzen. Diesmal funktionierte es nicht, vermutlich die eckigen Klammern. Außerdem habe ich einige meiner Fehler bemerkt. (Thank you for your demand. I always try to translate my native speakers by google translator. This time it did not work, presumably the square brackets. Besides, I've noticed some of my mistakes.) Hystrix (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status - no permission cases - several authors. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Régine Debatty
editDerivative work. These are pictures of 3D and 2D pieces of art.
- File:AIBO blinking.jpg
- File:Allen jones - Hatstand.jpg
- File:Aredactionpainting.jpg
- File:Centre de la Bande Dessinée.jpg
- File:Finale Foam Dresses, Collection Inertia, SS 2009. Hussein Chalayan (2).jpg
- File:Finale Foam Dresses, Collection Inertia, SS 2009. Hussein Chalayan (3).jpg
- File:Finale Foam Dresses, Collection Inertia, SS 2009. Hussein Chalayan.jpg
- File:Nobel Peace Center 9.jpg the video projected here could be blurred out.
- File:Nobel Peace Center 10.jpg
- File:Nobel Peace Center 16.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Watermarked.
- File:AFSGC-div2.jpg
- File:AFSGC-div1.jpg
- File:AFSGC-br.protec.civile1.jpg
- File:AFSGC-br.croix.rouge1.jpg
- File:AFSGC-b.sacré.coeur1.jpg
- File:AFSGC-b.groupe1.jpg
- File:AFSGC-b.c.3.JPG
- File:AFSGC-b.c.2.jpg
- File:AFSGC-b.c.1.jpg
- File:AFSGC-b.asso4.jpg
- File:AFSGC-chapeau1.jpg
- File:AFEN-ins.promesse-2a.jpg
- File:AFEN-bc-2.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tintin
editTinTin was first published in 1929, the author hasn't been dead for very long. Some of these are 3D derivatives of the artwork in the comic books. That still makes the pictures protected by copyright.
File:1Tintin-Wiener Tunnel ferroviaire sur la Oroya.jpg- File:2Wiener-Tintin-Dieu Soleil.jpg
File:4Wiener-Tintin-Pont suspendu.jpg- File:I volti di Tintin.JPG <- obvious copyvio
- File:Tintin at Expo 67.jpg<- this file might be de minimis when it comes to featuring tintin, but the Canadian national archive very likely still holds its copyright.
derivative works:
File:Triumph herald 1961 060117.jpg <- in this file the painting in the background should be blurred out in my opinion.- File:Fusée de Tintin.jpg
- File:FuseeLunaireTintinCentreBelgeBD-Bruxelles.JPG
- File:Casquette haddock.svg
- File:Le sceptre d' Ottokar.jpg
- File:Tintin exhibit bw.jpg
- File:Tintin in Congo.jpg
Vera (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- About drawings from Wiener book (printed in 1880) there is no more copyright, as far as the pictures come from the original book I have at home. The point is Hergé made a "copyvio" of Wiener Book. So I cannot understand why this pictures, done by mys-self could be supposed to be under copyright. Deuxtroy (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- I hardly speek any French, what do they have to do with Tintin? Did the author use them as source material? I'm confused :S --Vera (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that's the funny point, because Hergé'family is very hard with copyvio, but he used a lot of material without caring with copyright to draw Tintin's comic. A lot of drawings from this very old book are used in "Tintin - Le temple du Soleil" (De zonnetempel) and others. Sorry, I thought I had translate comments in english, but I am not very much experimented with commons editing rules. Yours. Deuxtroy (talk) 17:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- I hardly speek any French, what do they have to do with Tintin? Did the author use them as source material? I'm confused :S --Vera (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I fixt the image:Triumph herald 1961 060117.jpg. It is not a 3D- model of a Tintin image. It is a real car that is also used in the Tintin comic. --Walter (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- I've fixed it too. I blurred the poster, which I think is more subtle. --Vera (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
The rocket is a faithful replica of a real world rocket so going from real rocket to cartoon to model should perhaps not change it. // Liftarn (talk)
- If I were to draw something simple, like a chair, my drawing would be copyright protected. If you make a derivative work from it, it is still copyright protected. --Vera (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete File:Fusée de Tintin.jpg ; I don't know about the copyright argument, but this image is unnecessary as it's very similar to File:FuseeLunaireTintinCentreBelgeBD-Bruxelles.JPG, which I think is better. If the copyright argument stands, transwiki others to English Wikipedia under Fair Use rules. Fayenatic london (talk) 08:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:00, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lilian Mark (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Cathedrale de reims lumires.jpg
- File:Carte vignoble reims.png.jpg
- File:Bio champ cd.png
- File:Green bio.jpg
- File:Caves TCD.jpg
- File:Vintage canard duchene.jpg
- File:Canard duchene naturellement noble.jpg
- File:Demi sec.png
- File:Brut.jpg
- File:Rosé.png
- File:Léonie.png
- File:Vicotiruex canard duchene.jpg
- File:Grande rose canard duchene.jpg
- File:Lys canard duchene.png
- File:Beauté canard duchene.jpg
- File:Caves canard duchene.jpg
- File:Identite.jpg
- File:André Carrus pari mutuel.jpg
- File:Course hippique.jpg
- File:Aiguille à trier des années 60.jpg
- File:Totalisateur à transistor à Vincennes en 1967.jpg
- File:Siège de la Compagnie du Pari Mutuel.jpg
- File:Hippodrome Auteuil début XXè.jpg
- File:Marqueuse de ticket.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chalkietom (talk · contribs)
editCommons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.
- File:Corgi 448 Austin Mini Police Van.jpg
- File:Corgi 1128 Priestman Cub Shovel.jpg
- File:Dinky 350.jpg
- File:Corgi 1121.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chalkietom (talk · contribs)
editCommons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. Should be blanked to keep.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amemurakumahiko (talk · contribs)
edit
copy from the school website [11]
copy from [12]
-- 太刻薄 (talk) 17:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama in Denmark for buildings only A.J. (talk) 18:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. FOP laws do not apply here: it is not public space, it's a privately owned park with entrance fees. What's more, the park actively encourages visitors to take photographs and even promises that their employees will help and assist with taking pictures, eg. Blomsterpigerne er desuden behjælpelige, hvis tdu mangler hjælp til fotografering. [13]. tsca (talk) 10:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Copyright rarely covers just making photos, but distributing them. Without license, you may use this photo only for personal or fair use. Park owner's would probably be not happy if they see their photos advertising another enterprise without their permission. A.J. (talk) 16:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Right, because you know better than the owner of the work. Come on. tsca (talk) 19:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- "They wouldn't complain for sure", see COM:PRP. A.J. (talk) 14:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Why do you even persist? Again: your initial claim is invalid, FOP laws (§ 24 of the Danish Ophavsret) do not apply here, it is not a "work exhibited in a place accessible to the public". Just stop. tsca (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's EXACTLY my claim. FOP laws does not apply here, so please tell what OTHER law ("I think is OK because they allow making photos" is not a law) permits redistribution and commercial usage. EOT. A.J. (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Why do you even persist? Again: your initial claim is invalid, FOP laws (§ 24 of the Danish Ophavsret) do not apply here, it is not a "work exhibited in a place accessible to the public". Just stop. tsca (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- "They wouldn't complain for sure", see COM:PRP. A.J. (talk) 14:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Right, because you know better than the owner of the work. Come on. tsca (talk) 19:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Copyright rarely covers just making photos, but distributing them. Without license, you may use this photo only for personal or fair use. Park owner's would probably be not happy if they see their photos advertising another enterprise without their permission. A.J. (talk) 16:48, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Who is the sculptor of that work or is it a ready-made mass product? --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FOP is an exception to the general rule that an image of a copyrighted work will be a derivative work. The fact that FOP does not apply, means that this image infringes on the sculpture's copyright. Note to Turelio -- even mass produced sculptures have a copyright. Unless the frog is PD-old, this infringes. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is obviously a modern work of art and located in Iceland, which has no usable freedom-of-panaroma exemption from copyright. Thereby, this image violates the copyright of the sculptor. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I sent an e-mail to the artist and asked her what she thinks about the use of the picture of her artwork. I hope she will send an answer; then it should be clear whether the photo has to be deleted or not. -- DasPumm (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Túrelio! Steinunn Thorarinsdottir, die Erschafferin des besagten Kunstwerkes, hat mir folgendes geschrieben: "Hello Stefan and thank you for your note. Your photo of Álög is great. Thank you very much for inserting it. So please know that I agree that your photo is published in Wikipedia." Ist diese Zustimmung ausreichend, um das Foto auf der Seite zeigen zu dürfen? -- DasPumm (talk) 07:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Vom Gefühl her ja; aber ich möchte dich bitten, die komplette Email von Frau Thorarinsdottir an [email protected] (OTRS) zu mailen und dabei den Dateinamen File:Sandgerði.jpg zu erwähnen. Dann wird ein OTRS volunteer prüfen, ob das ausreicht und ggf. ein sog. OTRS-ticket ausstellen. Falls es nicht reicht, wird er/sie sich bei dir oder Frau Thorarinsdottir melden. Emails an OTRS werden vertraulich behandelt. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: 00:17, 29 August 2012 by Fastily. Note that the permission given is for Wikipedia only, which is not enough for Commons. Closed by . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I think PD-text logo applies here but I am not sure, the letter "A" is special Ezarateesteban 21:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Most likely a copyvio;
the uploader even claims it's his own work. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 21:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
No: Most of the users (specially newcomers) uses the CC license because is the default choice for most newcomers and not for bad faith. Assuming good faith with these files implies simply change the CC license with {{PD-textlogo}} or any other proper permissions tag. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: The geometric forms in the A are too simple to meet the threshold of originality; {{PD-textlogo}} is the right permissions tag. Amitie 10g (talk) 21:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Using a pair of dividers as an "A" is fairly common. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The artist died in 1945. These photographs are derivative works and infringe on the copyright belonging to his heirs. There is no evidence that we have any permission for these. Since he was French it is unlikely that any exception is available that will allow us to keep them unless we get permission from the heirs.
I have not included
which is a photograph of Printemps which may be PD. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- [The following is a copy of an e-mail sent to Jameslwoodward by Cecil H]
- WIKIPEDIA may get tranquility of conscience by verifying that the uploaded images are PUBLICLY SHOWN on the OFFICIAL WEBSITE dedicated to Léon Printemps. The website, developed by someone else, shows the uploaded paintings including others that are not uploaded yet.
- Jacques Noireau, the owner of all those paintings, is the grandson of Léon Printemps. He, and I, understand WIKIPDIA's concern to avoid raising any copyright problem. Let me know if WIKIPEDIA needs a declaration in writing and how it can be provided, so that we can close this file.
- [ends]
- Unfortunately the fact that the images are publicly shown elsewhere on the Web means very little. There is a great deal of material on the Web that is not properly licensed. Since there is nothing about copyright, one way or the other, at http://leon-printemps.fr.nf/, we must assume that everything there is copyrighted.
- Assuming that M. Noireau is Printemps's sole heir and owns the copyrights (which is different from owning the paintings), please have him send a message to Commons using the procedure at Commons:OTRS giving us either a license for the paintings listed above or a license for all Léon Printemps paintings uploaded by you, past and future. The message should come from [email protected], which is the address given for M. Noireau on the official web site. That will allow us to keep the images on Commons.
- If you will tell me here or on my talk page after that message has been sent, then I can promptly deal with it and close this DR. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 03:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)