Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 20:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).


August 27, 2021

August 26, 2021

August 25, 2021

August 24, 2021

August 23, 2021

August 22, 2021

August 21, 2021

August 20, 2021

August 19, 2021

August 17, 2021

August 16, 2021

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:Church_of_St_Elisabeth_the_New_Martyr_from_the_south_2.jpg

  • Nomination South side of the church of St Elisabeth the New Martyr, Wallasey Cemetery, with main entrance. --Rodhullandemu 19:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 19:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, I disagree! Clear CAs on both sides of the church. --Steindy 00:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
     Comment Fixed, or de minimis. Rodhullandemu 07:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

File:VIIC_uboat_shaded.svg

  • Nomination Shaded illustration of type VIIc uboat --Goran tek-en 18:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Without labeling what can be seen, the (good) drawing is useless in my opinion. --Steindy 14:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Very well done vector drawing, but labels/more consise description would be nice. --Nefronus 14:16, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • I understand labels would have added a lot but no such info was available. Is QI images about the quality of the image (technique) rather then the content. --Goran tek-en 18:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Steindy. I don't think diagrams are useful without labeling or a key. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support For a schematic like this one, labels would indeed be useful. However, this image can have labels added in several languages, making the file even more useful. Therefore, the original image, without labels, can be considered the QI while all the images created later (derivatives adding labels, using this as the starting point), will not. As for the quality, the layout appears correct and the lines are clean. --Peulle 07:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 08:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 07:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

File:View_of_Povoa_de_Lanhoso_(1).jpg

  • Nomination View of Póvoa de Lanhoso, Minho, Portugal. --Tournasol7 05:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Blown highlights + too strong HDR effect imo, sorry. --Nefronus 21:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • I disagree, it's not HDR image, where you see highligths? --Tournasol7 05:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support There are some very bright spots, but the photo is quite good, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 07:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ikan --Moroder 10:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question Are you a Smoker? It seems almost impossible that there is a fire in three places on top of each other (center of the picture). --Steindy 00:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
no, I am not. Tournasol7 11:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks unrealistic imo, maybe something odd in the editing? --Kallerna 07:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. --A.Savin 00:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:St_Peter_church_in_La_Croisille-sur-Briance_10.jpg

  • Nomination Stained-glass window in the Saint Peter church in La Croisille-sur-Briance, Haute-Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • It needs adjustments of the aspect ratio, circles should be circular --Poco a poco 07:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  • This stained glass window is old, it was not made with a industrial process or with CAO, the two circles are not circular, but I think this is not the aspect ratio. Or maybe I don't understand what tou mean. --Sebring12Hrs 15:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version uploaded, Tournasol7 20:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Much better now, thanks, Poco a poco 06:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I'll assume the glass really looks as depicted. Good quality. Was there an oppose vote? -- Ikan Kekek 07:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see a problem with the AR --Moroder 10:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Did you look into the file history? day and night to me Poco a poco 08:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 07:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Sts_Philip_and_James_church_in_Boisseuil_06.jpg

  • Nomination Sts Philip and James church in Boisseuil, H Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Comment CAs on the right side (e.g. the chimney). Otherwise good quality for me. --Domob 14:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry! Some CA not repaired. --Steindy 09:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Sorry I don't see the CAs. Discuss, please. --Tournasol7 05:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support A little red CA on the chimney, the roof above the clock, etc., but I really can't see it except on my 23 1/2-inch monitor. Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 07:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. Considering the image resolution, the few, narrow red edges are completely insignificant. They are invisible at a normal viewing distance, and are actually only noticeable when you touch the photo with the tip of your nose. A somewhat difficult lighting situation very well managed. --Smial 11:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 08:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 07:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Town_hall_of_Champnetery_(3).jpg

  • Nomination Town hall of Champnétery, Haute-Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • The house on the right edge of the picture should be cropped. --F. Riedelio 09:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done, Tournasol7 16:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Please see annotation. --F. Riedelio 16:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not really sharp in 100% --Goran tek-en 18:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but I disagree, discuss please. --Tournasol7 05:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Certainly sharp enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 07:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan --Moroder 12:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per other supporters. --Cayambe 07:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Dull weather, don't really understand why someone is bringing this to QIC. There are reasons why the uploader has not brought QIC by himself. --Kallerna 07:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Photos in any kind of weather can be good photos. -- Ikan Kekek 07:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  CommentYou don't understand ? Because he can only bring 5 photos per day. --Sebring12Hrs 11:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • "Please nominate only your best work" --Kallerna 14:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • It's not forbidden to nominate the work of another user. --Sebring12Hrs 15:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Of course it is not. Just why pick this, when many much better ones do not have this status? --Kallerna 16:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Regardes ici : [1]. Je n'ai pas le temps de regarder minutieusement chaque photo donc je les soumets au vote par groupe de cinq, certaines sont réussies, d'autres moins. C'est du français, mon anglais est trop mauvais, désolé. --Sebring12Hrs 17:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Kallerna 14:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Hippopotamus_(Hippopotamus_amphibius)_2.jpg

  • Nomination Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) --Charlesjsharp 11:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ximonic 12:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Since Charlesjsharp always makes a point of having every finger in a football player's picture, I have to say that the entire rear is missing. --Steindy 15:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  • This is not an evaluation of revenge, because unlike your rather lazy Hippo, I only have a fraction of a second to take a good photo at a soccer game. And it's not the first time that this has happened by you. --Steindy 19:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support This image is crisp and sharp, and the composition is obviously intentional, focusing on the head rather than capturing the whole animal.--Peulle 06:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Peulle. @Steindy, the options are also rather limited when shooting hippos in the wild, you can’t for example make the animal get out of the water to capture the whole body. --Nefronus 08:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality and no problem. -- Ikan Kekek 01:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality. SHB2000 04:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Y.ssk 16:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:2021-02-13_2nd_run_Women's_Monobob_(Bobsleigh_&_Skeleton_World_Championships_Altenberg_2021)_by_Sandro_Halank–018.jpg

  • Nomination 2nd run of the Women's Monobob at the Bobsleigh and Skeleton World Championships 2021 in Altenberg: Viktória Čerňanská (Slovakia) --Sandro Halank 11:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Stepro 12:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overexposed --Charlesjsharp 11:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see anything wrong with the exposure.--Peulle 06:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment The histogram still shows headroom for me. --Stepro 09:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support In fact, some small(1) areas clip, but they are insignificant for the picture as a whole and do not cause any annoying color distortions. Clearly a QI. --Smial 10:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC) (1) Not visible in a histogram of the entire photo.
  •  Support May be a bit overexposed in places, but OK. -- Ikan Kekek 01:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 01:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

File:2021-02-13_2nd_run_Women's_Monobob_(Bobsleigh_&_Skeleton_World_Championships_Altenberg_2021)_by_Sandro_Halank–012.jpg

  • Nomination 2nd run of the Women's Monobob at the Bobsleigh and Skeleton World Championships 2021 in Altenberg: Lubov Chernykh (Bobsleigh Federation of Russia) --Sandro Halank 11:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Stepro 12:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overexposed --Charlesjsharp 11:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks fine to me.--Peulle 06:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment The histogram still shows headroom for me. --Stepro 09:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support In fact, some small(1) areas clip, but they are insignificant for the picture as a whole and do not cause any annoying color distortions. Clearly a QI. --Smial 10:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC) (1) Not visible in a histogram of the entire photo.
  •  Support Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 01:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose looks overexposed to me. SHB2000 04:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC))

File:Maison,_14_rue_du_Docteur_Léon_Deglaire,_Montgeron.jpg

  • Nomination Maison, 14 rue du Docteur Léon Deglaire, Montgeron --Sebring12Hrs 11:04, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    The crop is a bit unfortunate: too much car, too little light pole. --Zinnmann 16:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
    :I disagree, I can't move back more, the light pool is here and I can't do nothing more. If crop the car, I will not have the portal good. --Sebring12Hrs 18:24, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition: 25 % just road. The rear of that car can be cropped out, too. --Palauenc05 07:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 07:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

File:2020-11-21_Rennrodeln,_Deutsche_Meisterschaften_in_Königssee_1DX_4822_by_Stepro.jpg

  • Nomination Luge, Deutsche Meisterschaften in Königssee: Norbert Loch (German Head coach). --Stepro 08:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Good quality, Unfortunately the tassel is cut off. --Steindy 08:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support And if you include all the tassel and some space so its not super tight, the face will be too far. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 01:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the tassel is cut off. SHB2000 04:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Andrew. --Smial 17:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Steindy and SHB2000 --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:SC_Wiener_Neustadt_vs._FK_Austria_Wien_II_2018-08-17_(079).jpg

  • Nomination Marko Pejic, footballplayer of FK Austria Wien. --Steindy 00:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose hand cropped --Charlesjsharp 11:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1. This does not seem to have been a conscious compositional choice.--Peulle 06:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 07:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Courtyard_Archway_and_Baskets,_Palacio_da_Pena.jpg

  • Nomination Yellow courtyard archway with stone baskets at Palácio Nacional da Pena --Y.ssk 14:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose It's oversharpened or something like that. --Stepro 12:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks for the feedback. My bad, I think I had sharpened this in two places. Fixed now in case it can be moved to consensual review. --Y.ssk 14:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Moving to consensual review. Thanks in advance for any further feedback. --Y.ssk 16:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support This version looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 01:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose due to the tilted perspective. --SHB2000 04:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Correcting the tilt per SHB2000 would improve this image. --GRDN711 12:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks SHB2000 and GRDN711. I've tried to fix the perspective here. Y.ssk 14:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --GRDN711 13:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Pulasan_(Mewarnai_wayang).jpg

  • Nomination An old man coloring Semar, a wayang character. At the top left there are Petruk (left) and Gareng (right) hanging. (by PL 05 SIGIT) --Labdajiwa 13:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough and wrong perspective. --Steindy 15:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Please reconsider. I applied an unsharpen mask. The image looks fine to me now. What's wrong with the perspective? --Zinnmann 10:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  • If you look at the door in the background you will see that it is not vertical. Also the head and the hand are not sharp. --Steindy 20:34, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Steindy. SHB2000 04:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Our_Lady_of_Peneda_sanctuary_26.jpg

  • Nomination Our Lady of Peneda sanctuary in Viana do Castelo district, Portugal. --Tournasol7 05:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose crop of pediment --Charlesjsharp 11:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Other parts of the building are croped, too - naturally. It's a picture of a part of the building, here the balcony. --Stepro 09:16, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Stepro's point is reasonable. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 16:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 16:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Zigarettenautomat_am_Südring_20210721_HOF01382.jpg

  • Nomination Cigarette vending automat in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    please fix the white borders at the top right and left --Sandro Halank 20:43, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
     Support Borders look fixed now. Good quality. --Y.ssk 07:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose overexposed --Charlesjsharp 11:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 01:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support LGTM. --SHB2000 04:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:2021-01-15_Eberspächer_Luge_World_Cup_Oberhof_1DX_4893_by_Stepro.jpg

  • Nomination Eberspächer Luge World Cup Oberhof: Jan Eichhorn (coach Oberhof); pictured in heavy snowfall through ringlight. --Stepro 01:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Interesting and nearly QI (IMO). But I would center the ring (or 1:2). --XRay 04:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose crop of ring --Charlesjsharp 11:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
     Comment As expected, the ring light does not float freely in the room. The alternative would be a disturbing tripod in the picture. --Stepro 09:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice idea, very good realisation. --Smial 17:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good photo, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 01:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I see the point of wanting the ring to be centered, but imo the centering of the main subject (the man) is more important.--Peulle 07:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 07:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

File:2020-11-21_Rennrodeln,_Deutsche_Meisterschaften_in_Königssee_1DX_4857_by_Stepro.jpg

  • Nomination Luge, Deutsche Meisterschaften in Königssee: Johannes Ludwig (GER). --Stepro 08:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Unfortunately the cap is cut off. --Steindy 08:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good quality, and I think portrait photographers have this kind of latitude. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. In this case I don't think the top cut is too jarring. --Y.ssk 08:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. Slightly cutting the top of the head is a recognized style in portrait photography.--Peulle 08:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the cap is cut off. SHB2000 04:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Muttukadu_Boat_House_Tamilnadu_Aug21_D72_20693-94.jpg

  • Nomination Muttukadu Boat House (panorama), from the ECR bridge, Tamilnadu, India --Tagooty 03:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough. --Steindy 09:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • I request other opinions, please. --Tagooty 15:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 06:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I would prefer it if the centre of the focus range was on the building rather than the plants in the f/g, but to me it's adequate for QI. Rodhullandemu 12:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The sharpness isn't great, the buildings are leaning to the left. All in all no QI. --Zinnmann 12:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Zinnmann 12:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_Nectaring_activity_of_Pieris_canidia_(Linnaeus,_1768)_–_Asian_Cabbage_White_(Male)_DSC_9423.jpg

  • Nomination Close wing Nectaring activity of Pieris canidia (Linnaeus, 1768) – Asian Cabbage White (Male) (by Arky1993) --Atudu 07:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Great pic! --Stepro 11:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose overprocessed on wings. And why don't you shoot at maximum resolution? --Charlesjsharp 10:11, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Doesn't seem good enough quality to me. Oversharpened in an attempt to fix unsharpness and noise, perhaps? I'm not sure about the details, but I know it doesn't look like a normal, sharp shot. -- Ikan Kekek 05:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too much oversharpened --Sandro Halank 12:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Strong oppose per Ikan and Sandro. SHB2000 04:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles.--Peulle 06:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)