Autonym (botany): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Restored some of the deleted information I added earlier (thanks CubicFeet for your editorial work)
Adding local short description: "Automatically created scientific name", overriding Wikidata description "automatically created scientific name" (Shortdesc helper)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{short description|Automatically created scientific name}}
In [[botanical nomenclature]], '''autonyms''' are automatically created names, as regulated by the ''[[International Code of Botanical Nomenclature]]'' (Vienna Code, 2006). Autonyms are cited without an author. Relevant provisions are in articles 6.8, 22.1-3 and 26.1-3.
In [[botanical nomenclature]], '''autonyms''' are automatically created names, as regulated by the ''[[International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants]]'' that are created for certain subdivisions of [[genus|genera]] and [[species]], those that include the [[type (biology)|type]] of the genus or species.<ref name=Turland>{{cite book|author=Turland, N.|year=2013|volume=Regnum Vegetabile Volume 155|title=The Code Decoded: A user's guide to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants|publisher=Koeltz Scientific Books|isbn=978-3-87429-433-1}}</ref> An autonym might not be mentioned in the publication that creates it as a side-effect.<ref name=Turland/> Autonyms "repeat unaltered" the genus name or species epithet of the taxon being subdivided, and no other name for that same subdivision is [[valid name (botany)|validly published]] (article 22.2). For example, ''[[Rubus]]'' subgenus ''Eubatus'' is not validly published, and the subgenus is known as ''Rubus'' subgen. ''Rubus''.
 
Autonyms are cited without an author. The publication date of the autonym is taken to be the same as that of the subdivision(s) that automatically established the autonym, with some special provisions (the autonym is considered to have priority over the other names of the same rank established at the same time (article 11.6)).
== Definition ==
The definition of an autonym is in Art. 6.8 of the ICBN:
 
Articles 6.8, 22.1-3 and 26.1-3 relate to establishing autonyms.<ref>{{cite book|author1=McNeill, J. |author2=Barrie, F.R. |author3=Buck, W.R. |author4=Demoulin, V. |author5=Greuter, W. |author6=Hawksworth, D.L. |author7=Herendeen, P.S. |author8=Knapp, S. |author9=Marhold, K. |author10=Prado, J. |author11=Prud'homme Van Reine, W.F. |author12=Smith, G.F. |author13=Wiersema, J.H. |author14=Turland, N.J. |year=2012|volume=Regnum Vegetabile 154|title=International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011|publisher=A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG|isbn=978-3-87429-425-6|url=http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php?page=title}}</ref>
"''6.8.'' Autonyms are such names as can be established automatically under Art. 22.3 and 26.3, whether or not they appear in print in the publication in which they are created (see Art. 32.8, Rec. 22B.1 and 26B.1)."
 
Autonyms are not created if the name of the genus or species being subdivided is [[Nomen illegitimum|illegitimate]].<ref name=Turland/>
:"''22.3.'' The first instance of valid publication<ref>The concept of '''''valid publication''''' deals with such matters as availability of the printed publication to the general public, designation of a type, presence of a description or diagnosis in Latin language, having a name in Latin form, indication of the rank, and so on (see ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 6.2)</ref> of a name of a subdivision of a [[genus]] under a legitimate<ref>The concept of a '''''legitimate name''''' deals with such matters as priority, homonymy, and so on (see ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 6.5)</ref> generic name automatically establishes the corresponding autonym." The form of this autonym is described in the earlier Art. 22.1: "The name of any subdivision of a genus that includes the [[botanical type|type]] of the [...] name of the genus to which it is assigned is to repeat the generic name unaltered as its [[epithet]], not followed by an author citation [...] Such names are termed autonyms".
 
== Definition ==
:"''26.3.'' The first instance of valid publication of a name of an [[infraspecific taxon]] under a legitimate species name automatically establishes the corresponding autonym." And as above, but now for inspraspecific taxa, Art. 26.1 says: "The name of any infraspecific taxon that includes the type of the [...] name of the species to which it is assigned is to repeat the specific epithet unaltered as its final epithet, not followed by an author citation [...] Such names are termed autonyms".
The definition of an autonym is in Art. 6.8 of the ICBNICN:
:"''6.8.'' Autonyms are such names as can be established automatically under Art. 22.3 and 26.3, whether or not they appear in print in the publication in which they are created (see Art. 32.8, Rec. 22B.1 and 26B.1)."
 
:"''22.3.'' The first instance of valid publication<ref>The concept of '''''valid publication''''' deals with such matters as availability of the printed publication to the general public, designation of a type, presence of a description or diagnosis in Latin language, having a name in Latin form, indication of the rank, and so on (see ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 6.2)</ref> of a name of a [[genus|subdivision of a [[genus]] under a legitimate<ref>The concept of a '''''legitimategeneric name''''' dealsautomatically withestablishes suchthe matterscorresponding as priority, homonymy, and so onautonym (see ICBNalso (Vienna Code) Art. 11.6 and 32.58)</ref> generic name automatically establishes the corresponding autonym." The form of this autonym is described in the earlier Art. 22.1: "The name of any subdivision of a genus that includes the [[botanical type|type]] of the [...] name of the genus to which it is assigned is to repeat the generic name unaltered as its [[epithet]], not followed by an author citation [...] Such names are termed autonyms".
== Interpretation ==
The application of names of taxonomic groups is determined by means of nomenclatural types (Principle II of the ICBN). For all taxa at the rank of species or below, nomenclatural types are preserved specimens or illustrations.<ref>After 1 Januari 2007, a type must be a preserved specimen. Only the type of a name of microscopic algae or microfungi may be an effectively published illustration if there are technical difficulties of preservation or if it is impossible to preserve a specimen that would show the features attributed to the taxon by the author of the name. See ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 37.4.</ref>
 
:"''26.3.'' The first instance of valid publication of a name of an [[infraspecific taxon]] under a legitimate species name automatically establishes the corresponding autonym (see also Art. 32.8 and 11.6)." And as above, but now for inspraspecificinfraspecific taxa, Art. 26.1 says: "The name of any infraspecific taxon that includes the type of the [...] name of the species to which it is assigned is to repeat the specific epithet unaltered as its final epithet, not followed by an author citation [...] Such names are termed autonyms".
In the case of an infraspecific taxon, if a botanist described a new taxon and publishes a new name at infraspecific level, all elements that previously belonged to the species (and are not included in the newly described taxon) now become a new infraspecific taxon. But as neither the type nor the final epithet has changed, there is no need for a change in author citation as all information that defines the newly defined infraspecific taxon is to be found in the [[protologue]] of the species name (or its [[basionym]]).<ref>The single most important purpose of an author citation is to enable the botanist to find the information, published in the protologue of a taxon.</ref>
 
== Interpretation ==
The same goes for a subdivision of a genus. If a botanist creates a new subdivision of a genus, for example by dividing a large genus into two or more smaller portions, then a new subdivision of the genus will share the type and have as its epithet the name of the genus and does not require a change in author citation.
The application of names of taxonomic groups is determined by means of nomenclatural types (Principle II of the ICN). For all taxa, nomenclatural types are preserved specimens or illustrations.
 
In the case of an infraspecific taxon, if a botanist described a new taxon and publishes a new name at infraspecific level, all elements that previously belonged to the species (and are not included in the newly described taxon) now become a new infraspecific taxon. But as neither the type nor the final epithet has changed, there is no need for a change in author citation as all information that defines the newly defined infraspecific taxon is to be found in the [[protologue]] of the species name (or its [[basionym]]).<ref>The single most important purpose of an author citation is to enable the botanist to find the information, published in the protologue of a taxon.</ref>
 
The same goes for a subdivision of a genus. If a botanist creates a new subdivision of a genus, for example by dividing a large genus into two or more smallersubgenera, sections, or portionsseries, then a new subdivision of the genus at each of the new ranks will share the type of the genus and have as its epithet the name of the genus and does not require a change in author citation.
 
As will be clear from the definition, an autonym can be one of two kinds:
Line 21 ⟶ 27:
:: [[Magnolia|''Magnolia'' L. sect. ''Magnolia'']], automatically established when [[Candolle|A.P. de Candolle]] published sect. ''Gwillimia'' DC., in: Syst. Nat. 1 (1817): 455.
* for a taxon at a rank below that of species (an infraspecific taxon), in which case the infraspecific epithet repeats the specific epithet (Art. 26), for example
:: [[Elmerrillia|''Elmerrillia papuana'' (Schltr.) Dandy var. ''papuana'']], automatically established when var. ''glaberrima'' Dandy, and var. ''adpressa'' Dandy were published, in Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1928(5) (1928): 185.
 
==Other provisions concerning autonyms==
Line 30 ⟶ 36:
The same goes, ''mutatis mutandis'', for infraspecific taxa.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 26.2. "A name of an infraspecific taxon that includes the type [...] of the [...] name of the species is not validly published unless its final epithet repeats the specific epithet unaltered. [...]"</ref>
 
An autonym is considered to have been published at exactly the same time as the earliest name(s) in that particular rank under the genus or species (the publication of the earliest name of a section in ''Magnolia'' L. established the autonym ''Magnolia'' L. sect. ''Magnolia''), even if not explicitly mentioned at that time.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 32.8: "Autonyms [...] are accepted as validly published names, dating from the publication in which they were established, whether or not they appear in print in that publication."</ref>
::When [[Alfred Rehder|Rehder]] & [[Ernest Henry Wilson|Wilson]] in [[Charles Sprague Sargent|C.S. Sargent]], Pl. Wilson. 1 (1913): 392, published ''Magnolia officinalis'' Rehder & E.H. Wilson var. ''biloba'', they established at the same time ''Magnolia officinalis'' Rehder & E.H. Wilson var. ''officinalis'', even though that name was nowhere mentioned in ''Plantae Wilsonianae''.
 
The autonym has nomenclatural [[Principle of Priority|priority]] over the name (or the names, as the case may be) that established it (ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 11.6).<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 11.6: "An autonym is treated as having priority over the name or names of the same date and rank that established it."</ref> This rule is of particular importance in combination with Art. 11.2: In no case does a name have priority outside the rank in which it is published. The following example will demonstrate this:
::When ''Heracleum sibiricum'' L., with subsp. ''lecokii'' (Godr. & Gren.) Nyman and subsp. ''sibiricum'' (autonym), is placed under [[Common Hogweed|''Heracleum sphondylium'' L.]] as a subspecies, then the correct name of the subspecies is ''Heracleum sphondylium'' L. subsp. ''sibiricum'' (L.) Simonk.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 11 Ex. 25.</ref> TheThis namecan ''Heracleumbe sibiricum''viewed hasas no priority outsideuniting the ranksubspecies of''lecokii'' species. Forand the correct name as a subspecies under ''H. sphondyliumsibiricum'' itinto isone essentialsubspecies, whichand ofas thesuch namesa publishedchoice athas theto rankbe ofmade subspeciesbetween hasthe priority.two Thissubspecies isnames; regulatedthe byautonym Art.''sibiricum'' 11.6has priority.
 
The type of an autonym is the same as that for the corresponding genus or species.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 7.6): "The type of an autonym is the same as that of the name from which it is derived."</ref> As an autonym is automatically created (without an author being involved), no author citation follows the name.
 
==See also==
* [[Principle of Coordination]] — a similar concept in the [[International Code of Zoological Nomenclature]] differs in that names are established at different ranks
 
==Notes and references==
<references/>
 
==External links==
* [http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/main.htm online version of the ICBN (Vienna Code, 2006)] (retrieved 20 Mar 2010)
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Autonym (Botany)}}
[[Category:Botanical nomenclature]]
 
[[es:Autónimo (botánica)]]
[[fr:Autonyme (botanique)]]
[[nl:Autoniem]]
[[sv:Autonym]]