Content deleted Content added
ce per talk, consistent related articles dealing with pseudoscience, the nature of its evidence, etc. |
m Stray word removed |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Pseudoscientific
{{
{{Multiple issues|
{{Excessive citations|date=March 2022}}
Line 9 ⟶ 8:
[[File:Talks on graphology, the art of knowing character through handwriting (1892) (14781407362).jpg|thumb|260x260px|A piece of handwriting used in graphological analysis, supposedly showing traits of "frivolity" and "triviality" in the writer]]
'''Graphology''' is the analysis of [[handwriting]] in an attempt to determine the writer's [[personality trait]]s. Its methods and conclusions are not supported by scientific evidence,<ref name="DriverBuckleyFrink1996">{{cite journal |last1=Driver |first1=Russell W. |last2=Buckley |first2=M. Ronald |last3=Frink |first3=Dwight D. |title=Should We Write Off Graphology? |journal=International Journal of Selection and Assessment |date=April 1996 |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=78–86 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-2389.1996.tb00062.x }}</ref><ref name="NYT1">{{cite news |last1=Cohen |first1=Roger |title=In France, It's How You Cross the t's |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/19/business/in-france-it-s-how-you-cross-the-t-s.html |work=The New York Times |date=19 October 1993 }}</ref> and as such it is considered to be a [[pseudoscience]].<ref name=nevo1986/><ref name=Graph_Beyer_PBS/><ref name="ReferenceA">{{Scientific American Frontiers|8|2|BEYOND SCIENCE? Paper Personality}}</ref><ref name = Dunning>{{Skeptoid|id=4363|number=363|title=All About Graphology|access-date=2 September 2016}}</ref>
==Etymology==
The word "graphology"
== History ==
In 1991, [[Jean-Charles Gille|Jean-Charles Gille-Maisani]] stated that [[Juan Huarte de San Juan]]'s 1575
Around 1830, [[Jean-Hippolyte Michon]] became interested in handwriting analysis. He published his findings<ref>{{Citation
Line 61 ⟶ 60:
[[Alfred Binet]] was convinced to conduct research into graphology from 1893 to 1907. He called it "the science of the future" despite rejection of his results by graphologists.
French
After [[World War I]], interest in graphology continued to spread in Europe and the United States. In Germany during the 1920s, [[Ludwig Klages]] founded and published his findings in
| last = Klages
| first = Ludwig
Line 102 ⟶ 101:
Regarding a proposed correlation between biological sex and handwriting style, a paper published by James Hartley in 1989 concluded that there was some evidence in support of this hypothesis.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hartley |first1=James |title=Sex Differences in Handwriting: a comment on Spear |journal=British Educational Research Journal |date=January 1991 |volume=17 |issue=2 |pages=141–145 |doi=10.1080/0141192910170204 }}</ref>
==
Although graphology had some support in the scientific community before the mid-twentieth century, more recent research rejects the validity of graphology as a tool to assess personality and job performance.<ref name=nevo1986>Nevo, B ''Scientific Aspects Of Graphology: A Handbook'' Springfield, IL: Thomas: 1986</ref><ref name="kingkoehler">{{cite journal |last1=King |first1=Roy N. |last2=Koehler |first2=Derek J. |title=Illusory correlations in graphological inference |journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied |date=2000 |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=336–348 |doi=10.1037/1076-898X.6.4.336 |pmid=11218342 |citeseerx=10.1.1.135.8305 }}</ref><ref>{{cite document |last1=Lockowandt |first1=Oskar |title=Present status of the investigation of handwriting psychology as a diagnostic method |publisher=American Psychological Association |year=1976 }}</ref> Today it is considered a [[pseudoscience]].<ref name=nevo1986/><ref name='Graph_Beyer_PBS'>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/safarchive/3_ask/archive/qna/3282_bbeyerstein.html |title=Barry Beyerstein Q&A |access-date=2008-02-22 |work=Ask the Scientists |publisher=[[Scientific American Frontiers]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070220080111/https://www.pbs.org/safarchive/3_ask/archive/qna/3282_bbeyerstein.html |archive-date=2007-02-20 }} "they simply interpret the way we form these various features on the page in much the same way ancient oracles interpreted the entrails of oxen or smoke in the air. i.e., it's a kind of magical divination or fortune telling where 'like begets like'".</ref><ref name="ReferenceA"/><ref name="NYT1"/><ref name="Dunning"/><ref>{{cite book |author=Goodwin CJ |title=Research In Psychology: Methods and Design |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eNsVUGTMcDoC&pg=PA36 |year=2010 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-470-52278-3 |page=36}}</ref> Many studies have been conducted to assess its effectiveness to predict personality and job performance. Recent studies testing the validity of using handwriting for predicting personality traits and job performance have been consistently negative.<ref name="nevo1986"/><ref name ="kingkoehler"/>
Line 122 ⟶ 120:
}}</ref> The [[British Psychological Society]] ranks graphology alongside [[astrology]], giving them both "zero validity".<ref name="duff"/>
Graphology was also dismissed as a
In his May 21, 2013 [[Brian Dunning (author)#Skeptoid podcasts|Skeptoid podcast]] episode titled "All About Graphology", [[Skeptical movement|scientific skeptic]] author [[Brian Dunning (author)|Brian Dunning]] reports:<ref name= Dunning /><blockquote>In his book ''The Write Stuff'', Barry Beyerstein summarized the work of Geoffrey Dean, who performed probably the most extensive literature survey of graphology ever done. Dean did a meta-analysis on some 200 studies:
Line 155 ⟶ 153:
| url-access = registration
}}</ref> primary argument against the use of graphology is that the [[effect size]] is too small. Regardless of the validity of handwriting analysis, the research results imply that it is not applicable for any specific individual, but may be applicable to a group.
* Vagueness: Some important principles of graphology are vague enough to allow significant room for a graphologist to skew interpretations to suit a subject or preconceived conclusion. For example, one of the main concepts in the theory of [[Ludwig Klages]] is
==
{{third-party|section|date= October 2014}}
Integrative graphology focuses on the strokes and their purported relation to personality.<ref name="Sciences 360">{{Cite web|url = http://www.sciences360.com/index.php/handwriting-analysis-and-the-secrets-of-graphology-3-22964/|title = Handwriting Analysis and the Secrets of Graphology|access-date = 2014-09-22|website = Sciences 360|publisher = Helium, Inc.|last = Carter|first = Molly|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140704202319/http://www.sciences360.com/index.php/handwriting-analysis-and-the-secrets-of-graphology-3-22964/|archive-date = 2014-07-04|url-status = live}}</ref> Graphoanalysis was the most influential system in the United States
[[Holism|Holistic]] graphology is based on form, movement, and use of space.<ref name="Sciences 360" />
Four academic institutions offer an accredited degree in handwriting analysis:
Line 184 ⟶ 181:
== Legal considerations ==
===
A report by the Hungarian Parliamentary Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information says that handwriting analysis without informed consent is a privacy violation.<ref name="nagymaros">{{cite journal | first = Attila | last = Péterfalvi | title = Overview of the Data Protection Commissioner's investigation into the tender for the notary position of the city of Nagymaros | publisher = Hungarian Parliamentary Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information | date = 16 March 2004 | url = http://abiweb.obh.hu/dpc/index.php?menu=reports/2004/III/4&dok=reports/2004/222&nyomtat=1 | access-date = 2008-06-21 | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://archive.today/20100109171828/http://abiweb.obh.hu/dpc/index.php?menu=reports/2004/III/4&dok=reports/2004/222&nyomtat=1 | archive-date = 9 January 2010 }}</ref>
===
==== Employment law====
Line 195 ⟶ 192:
=== Gender and handwriting ===
A 1991 review of the then-current literature concluded that respondents were able to predict the gender of handwriting between 57 and 78% of the time.<ref name="ReferenceB">{{Cite journal|doi=10.1080/0141192910170204|title=Sex Differences in Handwriting: A comment on Spear|year=1991|last1=Hartley|first1=James|journal=British Educational Research Journal|volume=17|issue=2|pages=141–145}}</ref> However, most of these samples, as well as subsequent studies, are based on small sample sizes that are collected
The reason for this bias varies; hypotheses are that biology contributes due to average differences in fine motor skills among males and females,<ref name="ReferenceB"/> and that differences arise from culture and gender bias.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi = 10.1080/00224545.1996.9712254|title = Inferring Gender from Handwriting in Urdu and English|year = 1996|last1 = Hamid|first1 = Sarah|last2 = Loewenthal|first2 = Kate Miriam|journal = The Journal of Social Psychology|volume = 136|issue = 6|pages = 778–782|pmid = 9043207}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1080/0141192890150304|title=Differences between the Written Work of Boys and Girls|year=1989|last1=Spear|first1=Margaret Goddard|journal=British Educational Research Journal|volume=15|issue=3|pages=271–277}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1080/00224540209603929|title=Judging Gender from Samples of Adult Handwriting: Accuracy and Use of Cues|year=2002|last1=Burr|first1=Vivien|journal=The Journal of Social Psychology|volume=142|issue=6|pages=691–700|pmid=12450344|s2cid=39650656}}</ref>
Line 230 ⟶ 227:
=== Graphotherapy ===
{{More medical citations needed|section|date=October 2014}}
''Graphotherapy'' is the pseudoscience of changing a person's handwriting with the goal of changing features of his or her personality, or "handwriting analysis in reverse."<ref>{{cite book|editor-last=Shermer |editor-first=Michael |title=The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Gr4snwg7iaEC&pg=PA119|volume=1|year=2002|publisher=Skeptic's Society|isbn=978-1-57607-653-8|page=119}}</ref> It originated in France during the 1930s, spreading to the United States in the late 1950s.<ref name="destpaul">{{Citation |last= de Sainte Columbe |first= Paul |title= Grapho Therapeutics: Pen and Pencil Therapy |location= Hollywood, CA |publisher= Paul de St Columbe Center |year= 1972 |edition= 2nd}}</ref> The purported therapy consists of a series of exercises similar to those taught in basic [[calligraphy]] courses, sometimes in conjunction with music or positive self-talk.
== See also ==
Line 260 ⟶ 257:
== External links ==
* [http://skepdic.com/graphol.html Skeptic's Dictionary entry on graphology]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4223445.stm BBC article about graphology]
|