Content deleted Content added
Reverting edit(s) by 168.244.201.23 (talk) to rev. 1244654599 by Wikishovel: Vandalism (UV 0.1.5) |
→Peter Brimelow page: Reply |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 308:
:I made a mess of that. I still don't know how those bad revision got into [[Talk:Yawn]] but I think I've got them all now. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq#top|talk]]) 10:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
::Yes looks good now, thanks very much. [[User:Wikishovel|Wikishovel]] ([[User talk:Wikishovel|talk]]) 10:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
== Rapid-fire bogus tagbombing by user with less than 400 edits ==
This user [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Akaibu#] is adding rapid-fire (75+ per day) bogus tags (like the utterly spurious "underlinked") to articles, apparently via scripts he has added to his account. I warned him on his usertalk [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Akaibu&diff=prev&oldid=1245468021] (his last tagging before my warning was on [[Aelbert Cuyp]]). I've reverted about 40 of them over the past 40 minutes, but it's an exhausting ritual (maybe 1% to 5% of his tags are merited) and I'm tired of it. Not sure of the best course of action, but definitely needs eyes and a block if it continues. Plus need more of the tagging reverted/rolled back. Any help appreciated. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 06:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
:I left a message at their talk and will probably notice any further comments added there. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq#top|talk]]) 07:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks. By the by, this rapid-fire 80-edits-per day MO is often standard behavior of someone trying to rapidly achieve EC status, so might take a look at his edits again once he hits 500. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 08:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] I will note that this is not an attempt to pad for EC status(if you wish to believe me on that), in fact looking into what EC provides I don't see much reason to shoot for it, except ''maybe'' Content Translation, but I'm not currently comfortable adding major content to pages like that. [[User:Akaibu|Akaibu]] ([[User talk:Akaibu|talk]]) 13:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
::::The advice at [[Wikipedia:Teahouse#On tagging]] is good. In brief: improving articles is productive; tagging is not. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq#top|talk]]) 00:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
::::[[User:Akaibu|Akaibu]], you certainly do not seem to be [[WP:HERE|here to build an encyclopedia]]. You're skating on pretty thin ice now that you are continuing to do what you were warned by multiple highly experienced editors plus an administrator not to do. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 05:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Update: That's still all he's doing. I've reverted most of the new ones now, as they were unwarranted. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 05:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
:Blocked for 48 hours with explanation at [[User talk:Akaibu#Tags]]. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq#top|talk]]) 05:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you. Right before your block he was EDIT-WARRING over my reverts from today. Clearly this editor is not here to build an encyclopedia. Has the air of a possible LTA. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 05:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
:::There is probably an essay describing the high correlation between confidence and socking. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq#top|talk]]) 05:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
== Continuous removal of sourced content ==
Hi John, please take a look on [[Chittagonian language]]. A user keeps removing its content (even though those content has reliable sources) and keeps adding thier preferred version. The same user did same thing on bnwiki and we reverted their edits.
I reverted their edit twice here on enwiki & asked the user to stop but the user still doing it. I did not reverted their latest edit as I don't want to get involved in edit wars.
I think it would be better to restore the last good version until there is a consensus. Could you please help here? Thanks. [[User:আফতাবুজ্জামান|আফতাবুজ্জামান]] ([[User talk:আফতাবুজ্জামান|talk]]) 22:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
:I left a warning at [[User talk:Yasarhossain07]]. Let me know if it continues but first try to engage with them in discussion on article talk. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq#top|talk]]) 02:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
== Peter Brimelow page ==
Consensus has been reached. Is it possible to remove protection? [[User:Cundebuff|Cundebuff]] ([[User talk:Cundebuff|talk]]) 03:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Cundebuff}} I do not understand because [[Talk:Peter Brimelow#Protected]] (added by me) is 5.5 hours after all other comments. Please do not reply here. Instead, comment in that section and quote a few words from the discussion that shows there is a consensus. Also, briefly outline what the consensus is. That is, what change, if any, is proposed? It should be on article talk so others can see it. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq#top|talk]]) 03:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
::Ok. Thought it was to be requested here. [[User:Cundebuff|Cundebuff]] ([[User talk:Cundebuff|talk]]) 04:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
| |||