Content deleted Content added
tag with {{Bare URL PDF}}. Note that refs to PDFs cannot be filled by any tool or bot. They need to be filled manually |
|||
Line 150:
| url-status=bot: unknown
}}</ref></blockquote>
Critics argued the Conventions obliged the U.S. to conduct [[competent tribunal]]s to determine the status of prisoners. Subsequently, the [[U.S. Department of Defense]] instituted [[Combatant Status Review Tribunal]]s (CSRTs), to determine whether detainees met the new definition of an "[[enemy combatant]]".
"Enemy combatant" was defined by the U.S. Department of Defense as:
Line 156:
The CSRTs are not bound by the [[rules of evidence]] that would normally apply in civilian court, and the government’s evidence is presumed to be “genuine and accurate.”<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RS22173.pdf |title=Detainees at Guantanamo Bay: Report for Congress |publisher=[[Congressional Research Service]] |first=Jennifer K. |last=Elsea |date=July 20, 2005 |access-date=2007-11-10 }}</ref>
From July 2004 through March 2005, CSRTs were convened to determine whether each prisoner had been correctly classified as an "enemy combatant".
|url = http://www.defenselink.mil/news/ISN10019.pdf#1
|title = Combatant Status Review Tribunal, transcript 10017
Line 266:
</ref>
Riduan Isamuddin was one of the 71 individuals deemed too innocent to charge, but too dangerous to release.
Although Obama promised that those deemed too innocent to charge, but too dangerous to release would start to receive reviews from a [[Periodic Review Board]] as less than a quarter of men have received a review. Isamuddin was denied approval for transfer on September 19, 2016.<ref>https://www.prs.mil/Portals/60/Documents/ISN10019/161025_U_FOUO_ISN10019_FINAL_DETERMNATION_PUBLIC_v1.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=October 2022}}</ref>
==Further reading==
Line 276:
==References==
{{More footnotes needed|date=February 2008}}
{{Reflist|2|refs=
|