Revision as of 18:37, 18 July 2024 edit CNMall41 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 65,852 edits →‎Should we indicate that City Journal has been described as "right-wing"?: add ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:27, 19 July 2024 edit undo XavierItzm (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,796 edits →‎Should we indicate that City Journal has been described as "right-wing"?: weak sauce
Line 70: :::So there is one reference that says "right-wing" out of the three. If you want to use the second reference, it would not be NPOV to use one description over the other. And it seems we are disregarding the third reference that says conservative. All three sources balance out so why is it "right-wing" being chosen ('''first ref''' = right wing, '''second ref''' = conservative, right, right wing, etc., '''third reference''' = conservative)? --[[User:CNMall41\|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41\|talk]]) 18:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC) :::I also just checked Allsides on RSN and there are quite a few discussions including [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_375#Survey:_Allsides this one] so not sure if it is usable. --[[User:CNMall41\|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41\|talk]]) 18:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC) ::::The sourcing was extremely weak. Substantive sourcing —not passing mentions— would be needed in order for the qualification to be re-added.[[User:XavierItzm\|XavierItzm]] ([[User talk:XavierItzm\|talk]]) 15:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Talk:City Journal: Difference between revisions