Nishidani

:I don't think I could be of much help. I pay very little attention to I/P dispute resolution, RfCs or the relevant wikiproject pages, which I don't even have bookmarked.As for Arbcom and the sanctions system, I pay attention when I'm dragged into them of course, 5 times over the last year. Generally, as I see it, the conflicts are between people who go to some trouble to read widely in the topic area, and people who are offended by scholarship or informed opinion, and will go to great lengths to argue on talk pages, or revert what they dislike, often captiously. The point was egregiously thrown into relief in the immense effort, by editors who knew nothing of the topic literature (see the AfD and the talk pages) to change the title of the article [[Zionism, race and genetics]]([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_conceptions_of_Jewish_identity_in_Zionism here]. They were successful, i.e. the editors who didn't read the sources managed to strongaremstrongarm by numbers a change of title by sheer attrition and the disattention of other editors who wandered in. From an administrative POVperspective, on the other hand, both sides were culpable of hammering their points of view: it didn't matter that one 'side' read several hundred pages, at least, of documentation, while the other side just kibitzed the paraphrases of the contrentcontent on the talk page, quarrelling with, effectively, the scholarship.