Content deleted Content added
→legal cases in the UK: Reply |
|||
Line 290:
::Surely it is unacceptable to broadly liken either side on this debate, to the Nazis, surely that should be condemned, as it would not be fair to call either trans rights activists or gender critical feminists, that term. I would oppose it in both cases. As both are completely different causes as we all know. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C4:B3AD:8E01:7896:3C92:6D02:675B|2A00:23C4:B3AD:8E01:7896:3C92:6D02:675B]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C4:B3AD:8E01:7896:3C92:6D02:675B|talk]]) 17:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
:Disagree, Godwin’s Law is useful when talking about social movements against marginalized groups. [[User:Snokalok|Snokalok]] ([[User talk:Snokalok|talk]]) 17:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
::This debate is often about powerful people using their power to shut down less powerful people, like when they shout down middle aged female intelectuals just for saying biological sex exists. It is horrible that they got Kathleen Stock sacked for saying biological sex exists, and terrible they are calling people Nazis just for saying biological sex exists, this is bullying behaviour, and needs condemning. Believing biological sex exists, is not a far right belief. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C4:B3AD:8E01:7896:3C92:6D02:675B|2A00:23C4:B3AD:8E01:7896:3C92:6D02:675B]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C4:B3AD:8E01:7896:3C92:6D02:675B|talk]]) 11:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
| |||