Content deleted Content added
Loadmaster (talk | contribs) →Nomenclature in IBM 7094 registers table: Now for the IBM 709 register infobox, et al |
→Nomenclature in IBM 7094 registers table: 709; layout of bit numbers |
||
Line 337:
My preference for the bit position numbers is the <sup>1</sup><sub>2</sub> format instead of the <small>12</small> form, on the theory that it is slightly more horizontally compact. It's also the style used in many other existing CPU infoboxes ([[8080]], [[i386]], [[68000]], etc.). — [[User:Loadmaster|Loadmaster]] ([[User talk:Loadmaster|talk]]) 01:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
: {{tq|Now can someone apply the same fixes to the register infobox in the [[IBM 709]] article?}}
: I can't find a 709 principles of operation. Can anybody confirm that the 709 has the same 36-bit SI register as the 709?
: {{tq|My preference for the bit position numbers is the <sup>1</sup><sub>2</sub> format instead of the <small>12</small> form, on the theory that it is slightly more horizontally compact.}}
: That's the way that I originally wrote it, but {{IP|135.180.103.252}} changed it in [[special:permalink/1242250376|permalink/1242250376]]; the changed version more closely matches the manual. -- [[User:Chatul|Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul]] ([[User talk:Chatul|talk]]) 13:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
== [[endianness]] ==
| |||