Talk:Barack Obama: Difference between revisions

This article is absolute proof why Wikipedia is rapidly becoming obsolete on the internet. THe unbelievable bias of wiki hawks who use the Almighty "Criticisms and controversies" sections (if it exists) to slam a topic or (remove it) to promote a topic. BIAS! This article is biased. Every republican candidate has a major criticisms section. Obviously the protectors of this article are pro-obama. Wikipedia is a terrible website. Its bias is well known. This is why its founders made a new site. I look forward to Knol. You biased bigots that pretend to be "NPOV" can keep up with your fasaad. Only when it suits you will you say hypocrisy like "Well, technically a wiki article shouldn't have a criticism section". Of course! LMAO. When it is your precious Obama, you defend against NOT having one. When it is Obama's competitors or (brace yourself) a republican, then the criticism section becomes mandatory! UTTER HYPOCRISY! This website is an aboslute joke. If you were truly fair, you would pUt up a criticisms section on Obama. But you wont. Thats because you are unable to be NPOV. (hypocritical responses will follow)