Revision as of 23:42, 10 January 2008 edit Ultraexactzz (talk \| contribs) 26,830 edits →‎User:Tvoz: final word. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:46, 10 January 2008 edit undo Ricxster (talk \| contribs) 99 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 67: I am going to say this once. I have no idea who you are, where you edit from, what your name is, whether you are 10 years old or 60 years old, whether you are an academic, a shoe salesman, a man or a woman. You chose to edit without revealing your actual identity - that is your right. You accused me and Bellwether (and I'm not even going to bother looking back to see who else) of editing with an agenda and have been uncivil to me and others repeatedly. You have violated Wikipedia policy right and left. You said in a comment that you are an academic - that may or may not be true - I have no way to know. I said to you "Best of luck to you and your students if you really are an academic." I have no more reason to believe that you are one than that you are not one. You have provided no credentials or any other evidence other than your claim, nor am I the slightest bit interested in seeing your credentials or finding out more about you. I have not defamed you or attacked you whatsoever, and if you think you're going to intimidate me by having sought out my name and included it in your post on my talk page, and cyberstalked me by searching on my name, you are sadly mistaken. Do not contact me on or off of Wikipedia. <strong>[[User:Tvoz\|Tvoz]] </strong>\|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz\|talk]]</small> 23:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC) {{unblock reviewed\|1=I made no threat in law, but will remove mention of any perceived legal ~~ambiguity~~threat. However you have no right to demand apology or occasion requirement on my future activities. Is Wikipedia violating the First Amendment and all things in regards to freedom of speech and requirement on future? I said nothing untoward and have promised to remove ambiguity - but if you seek to have influence in my life, a say in regards to what i may or may not do in the future - you can can take a running jump. I am however willing to seek solution to relations between another editor and myself - for i believe that it could be settled amicably. I have proceeded with Arbitration in regards to that shocking request which is so far removed from what I would expect of a wiki admin\|decline=That statement is not a reason why you should be unblocked, not is it a clear withdrawal of legal threats. Note that Wikipedia, a private website, is not bound to observe the U.S. bill of rights. It may censor whoever it wants to. — [[User:Sandstein\|Sandstein]] ([[User talk:Sandstein\|talk]]) 23:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)}} *'''Note to reviewing admin''': please see comments in penultimate section of this talk page regarding the threat of future threats. Thanks. ➔ '''[[User talk:Redvers\|REDVEЯS]]''' is standing in the dark 23:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Ricxster