Content deleted Content added
→Requested move: closed as move to Tiangong |
→cargo craft: new section |
||
Line 97:
– The space station programme is already far more notable than the other topics on the disambiguation page (stubs about a steel manufacturer and a low-division football club, and part of the name of an encyclopaedia which doesn't have its own article). I believe that [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]] applies, especially since the notability of the space station programme will rise further once one is launched. '''''[[User:GW Simulations|<font color="#115566">G</font>]][[User talk:GW_Simulations|<font color="#496636">W</font>]]'''''[[Special:Contributions/GW_Simulations|…]] 13:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
== cargo craft ==
according to [http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Why_Tiangong_is_not_a_Station_Hub_999.html] the Tiangong-1 craft will be adapted to be a cargoship. [[Special:Contributions/70.24.246.151|70.24.246.151]] ([[User talk:70.24.246.151|talk]]) 14:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
| |||