Autonym (botany): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Addbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Migrating 4 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q1837887 (Report Errors)
This shouldn't just reproduce the Code, it needs drastic trimming to become comprehensible to a wider audience (don't have time to finish that now)
Line 1:
In [[botanical nomenclature]], '''autonyms''' are automatically created names, as regulated by the ''[[International Code of Botanical Nomenclature]]'' (Viennafor Codealgae, 2006)fungi, and plants]]''. Autonyms are cited without an author. Relevant provisions are in articles 6.8, 22.1-3 and 26.1-3.<ref>{{cite book|author=McNeill, J.; Barrie, F.R.; Buck, W.R.; Demoulin, V.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Herendeen, P.S.; Knapp, S.; Marhold, K.; Prado, J.; Prud'homme Van Reine, W.F.; Smith, G.F.; Wiersema, J.H.; Turland, N.J.|year=2012|volume=Regnum Vegetabile 154|title=International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011|publisher=A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG|isbn=978-3-87429-425-6|url=http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php?page=title}}</ref>
 
==Definition==
The definition of an autonym is in Art. 6.8 of the ICBNICN:
:"''6.8.'' Autonyms are such names as can be established automatically under Art. 22.3 and 26.3, whether or not they appear in print in the publication in which they are created (see Art. 32.8, Rec. 22B.1 and 26B.1)."
 
:"''22.3.'' The first instance of valid publication of a name of a [[genus|subdivision of a genus]] under a legitimate generic name automatically establishes the corresponding autonym (see also Art. 11.6 and 32.8)." The form of this autonym is described in the earlier Art. 22.1: "The name of any subdivision of a genus that includes the [[botanical type|type]] of the [...] name of the genus to which it is assigned is to repeat the generic name unaltered as its epithet, not followed by an author citation [...] Such names are termed autonyms".
Line 10:
 
==Interpretation==
The application of names of taxonomic groups is determined by means of nomenclatural types (Principle II of the ICBN<ref>(Vienna Code)</ref>ICN). For all taxa, nomenclatural types are preserved specimens or illustrations.<ref>After 1 Januari 2007, there are some restrictions for new names as to when a type can be an illustration. See ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 37.4.</ref>
 
In the case of an infraspecific taxon, if a botanist described a new taxon and publishes a new name at infraspecific level, all elements that previously belonged to the species (and are not included in the newly described taxon) now become a new infraspecific taxon. But as neither the type nor the final epithet has changed, there is no need for a change in author citation.
 
The same goes for a subdivision of a genus. If a botanist creates a new subdivision of a genus, for example by dividing a large genus into two or more smallersubgenera, sections, or portionsseries, then a new subdivision of the genus at each of the new ranks will share the type of the genus and have as its epithet the name of the genus and does not require a change in author citation.
 
As will be clear from the definition, an autonym can be one of two kinds:
Line 20:
:: [[Magnolia|''Magnolia'' L. sect. ''Magnolia'']], automatically established when [[Candolle|A.P. de Candolle]] published sect. ''Gwillimia'' DC., in: Syst. Nat. 1 (1817): 455.
* for a taxon at a rank below that of species (an infraspecific taxon), in which case the infraspecific epithet repeats the specific epithet (Art. 26), for example
:: [[Elmerrillia|''Elmerrillia papuana'' (Schltr.) Dandy var. ''papuana'']], automatically established when var. ''glaberrima'' Dandy, and var. ''adpressa'' Dandy were published, in Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1928(5) (1928): 185.
 
==Other provisions concerning autonyms==
Line 29:
The same goes, ''mutatis mutandis'', for infraspecific taxa.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 26.2. "A name of an infraspecific taxon that includes the type [...] of the [...] name of the species is not validly published unless its final epithet repeats the specific epithet unaltered. [...]"</ref>
 
An autonym is considered to have been published at exactly the same time as the earliest name(s) in that particular rank under the genus or species (the publication of the earliest name of a section in ''Magnolia'' L. established the autonym ''Magnolia'' L. sect. ''Magnolia''), even if not explicitly mentioned at that time.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 32.8: "Autonyms [...] are accepted as validly published names, dating from the publication in which they were established, whether or not they appear in print in that publication."</ref>
::When [[Alfred Rehder|Rehder]] & [[Ernest Henry Wilson|Wilson]] in [[Charles Sprague Sargent|C.S. Sargent]], Pl. Wilson. 1 (1913): 392, published ''Magnolia officinalis'' Rehder & E.H. Wilson var. ''biloba'', they established at the same time ''Magnolia officinalis'' Rehder & E.H. Wilson var. ''officinalis'', even though that name was nowhere mentioned in ''Plantae Wilsonianae''.
 
The autonym has nomenclatural [[Principle of Priority|priority]] over the name (or the names, as the case may be) that established it (ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 11.6).<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 11.6: "An autonym is treated as having priority over the name or names of the same date and rank that established it."</ref> The following example will demonstrate this:
::When ''Heracleum sibiricum'' L., with subsp. ''lecokii'' (Godr. & Gren.) Nyman and subsp. ''sibiricum'' (autonym), is placed under [[Common Hogweed|''Heracleum sphondylium'' L.]] as a subspecies, then the correct name of the subspecies is ''Heracleum sphondylium'' L. subsp. ''sibiricum'' (L.) Simonk.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 11 Ex. 25.</ref> This can be viewed as uniting the subspecies ''lecokii'' and the subspecies ''sibiricum'' into one subspecies, and as such a choice has to be made between the two subspecies names; the autonym ''sibiricum'' has priority.
 
The type of an autonym is the same as that for the corresponding genus or species.<ref>ICBN (Vienna Code) Art. 7.6): "The type of an autonym is the same as that of the name from which it is derived."</ref> As an autonym is automatically created (without an author being involved), no author citation follows the name.
 
==See also==
Line 42:
==Notes and references==
<references/>
 
==External links==
* [http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/main.htm online version of the ICBN (Vienna Code, 2006)] (retrieved 20 Mar 2010)
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Autonym (Botany)}}