Climbing specialist: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Fixed missing references list – You can help Category:Pages with missing references list
Line 18:
 
==Climbing physics and physiology==
Sports [[physiology|physiologists]] have attributed the advantage that small stature holds in cycling up steep ascents to the way in which body [[mass]] and body [[surface area]] scale according to height (see [[square-cube law]]). As a hypothetical cyclist’s height increases, the surface areas of his body increase according to the square of his height whereas the mass of his body increases according to the cube of his height. The surface area relation applies not only to the total surface area of the body, but also to the surface areas of the [[lungs]] and [[blood vessels]], which are primary factors in determining [[Aerobic exercise|aerobic]] power. Thus, an equally-proportioned cyclist who has 50% more body mass (i.e. is 50% heavier) will generate only about 30% more aerobic power. On a steep climb most of the cyclist’s energy goes into lifting his own weight, so the heavier cyclist will be at a competitive disadvantage. There is, of course, a lower limit to the benefit of small stature because, among other factors, the cyclist must also lift the weight of his bicycle. The additional power is proportional to the [[Grade (slope)|grade]] or slope of the road and the speed of the rider along the slope (or along the level line). For a 5% grade, each meter of road requires lifting the body weight by 5 cm. The power (watts) is equal to change in [[gravitational potential energy]] (joules) per unit time (seconds). For a {{convert|60|kg}} rider, the additional power needed is about 30 watts per meter/second of road speed (about 8 watts per km/hour).
 
Scaling factors also account for the relative disadvantage of the small cyclist in descending, although more asthis a result of [[physics]], thannot physiology. A larger rider will experience a more powerful [[gravitational force]] because of his greater body mass, but he will not have as great an increase in the frontal area that creates [[Drag equation|aerodynamic drag]]. The downward force is proportional to the cube of height whereas the frontal area is proportional to the square of height. Descending exclusively under the force of gravity—i.e. not applying power through pedaling—the heavier rider will be faster and will reach a higher [[terminal velocity]].
 
Although these factors might seem to cancel each other out, the climber still has an advantage on a course with long ascents and long descents: adding several miles per hour on a slow, time-consuming climb is much more valuable than the same increase on a fast and brief descent. Any rider, of course, can improve his climbing speed by increasing his aerobic power and reducing his body weight and can increase his descending speed through better bike handling and the willingness to accept an increased risk of crashing. One of the few elite riders to use descending skill as a competitive advantage is [[Paolo Savoldelli]], nicknamed "the falcon".