Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 4 discussion(s) to User talk:Chris the speller/Archive 6) (bot |
→March 1932 lunar eclipse Rating: new section |
||
Line 120:
:::{{ping|Emperorofthedaleks}} I already viewed the websites, and it sounds like both of them are making stuff up. You could flip a coin, but better to show both sources and say that there is more than one theory. [[User:Chris the speller|<font color="#C30">'''Chris'''</font> <font color="#060">'''the speller'''</font>]] [[User talk:Chris the speller|<font color="#900"><sup>yack</sup></font>]] 21:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Chris the speller}} Alright, thanks. --[[User:Emperorofthedaleks|Emperorofthedaleks]] ([[User talk:Emperorofthedaleks|talk]]) 21:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
== March 1932 lunar eclipse Rating ==
I rated the page [[March 1932 lunar eclipse]] as a stub and of low importance. [[Special:Contributions/78.148.76.115|78.148.76.115]] ([[User talk:78.148.76.115|talk]]) 16:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
| |||