Content deleted Content added
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) Importing Wikidata short description: "American mathematician and novelist" (Shortdesc helper) |
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 1 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0 |
||
Line 175:
|author1=Lochak, Pierre
|author2=Schneps, Leila
|date=2013
|title=Grothendieck–Teichmüller groups
|url=http://www.newton.ac.uk/programmes/GDO/lectureseries.html#grothendieck
|accessdate=2014-01-02
|journal=Grothendieck–Teichmüller Groups, Deformation and Operads
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140309171621/http://www.newton.ac.uk/programmes/GDO/lectureseries.html#grothendieck
|archive-date=2014-03-09
|url-status=dead
}}</ref><ref>{{citation
|author1=Schneps, Leila
Line 292 ⟶ 295:
|volume=428
|accessdate=2014-02-08
|date=September 2013
}}{{Dead link|date=February 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> and another finding the book suitable "for parents trying to support teenagers in their studies of mathematics – or in fact, law".<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Tarttelin, Abigail
|year=2013
Line 302 ⟶ 306:
While most reviews were positive, there was some criticism concerning its over-simplification of mathematics' influence in complex trial proceedings. One reviewer finds that, while the book's description of the weakness of some mathematics presented in courtrooms is valid, the text magnifies mathematics' role in legal proceedings, which traditionally feature evidentiary analysis at appellate as well as trial stages and have preexisting standards for treating certain types of evidence.<ref>{{citation
|author1=Finkelstein, Michael
|date=Jul–Aug 2013
|number=6
|title=Quantitative Evidence Often a Tough Sell in Court
Line 308 ⟶ 312:
|volume=46
|journal=SIAM News
|access-date=2014-03-09
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160416071151/http://www.siam.org/pdf/news/2091.pdf
|archive-date=2016-04-16
|url-status=dead
}}</ref> Another suggests the book was influenced by the authors' selection of cases to show a "disastrous record of causing judicial error", thus attributing insufficient weight to the counterbalancing traditionally inherent in legal proceedings—as lawyers attack opposing evidence and experts with their own, and appellate judges write to influence the conduct of trial judges faced with various types of ordinary and expert testimony.<ref>{{citation
|author1=Edelman, Paul
| |||