Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Partysmores999/The Ninja Club
Wikipedia doesn't need a "ninja club" of Wikipedia "protectors", especially from a self-described "master/sensei" with a penchant for creating fake articles about speculative future seasons of TV shows. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 22:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Blergh. Delete, obviously. The CVU is bad enough, we don't need more ul17r4 1337 anti-vandalism silliness. → ROUX ₪ 23:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
We need it -Partysmores99
- For what? → ROUX ₪ 00:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Come on, we need to get less people spamming and more people removing the stuff people do. I don't find it fair that some user put a while back that Katie, Sadie, Cody, Eva, and Tyler were returning to TDA and I can't put that Noah's returning? -Partysmores999
- Keep. Visitor books, secret pages, and other play things are good for learning, community building, and community spirit, as long as they are kept incidental to the participants serious contributions. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete userspace is indexed on google. This is not the sort of stuff we want to be presenting to the world. Gigs (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. After a long look through Wikipedia:User page#What may I not have on my user page?, I can't find anything this page is violating. There's nothing on the page that is divisive (at least, unless somebody's Pirate Club comes along to object :) ) or belittling of other editors. The page appears to be secondary and and adjunct to editing Wikipedia; Partysmores999 isn't here just to run his club. —C.Fred (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. Its not going to do any harm. Why don't we just leave it alone? If it gets out of hand, that's when we delete it. Programmer13TalkWhat I do 13:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)