User talk:Blanchardb/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Water in moon
I changed your CSD tag, it was not a hoax (they really did) but rather a copyvio of http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20091115-236337/Thrilling-discovery-Lots-of-water-on-moon. Thanks for patrolling though and keep up the good work! You already beat me to a few speedys! (Not that it's a race, of course!)-- fetchcomms☛ 03:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey Blanchardb, I removed your speedy on Tsonka ball and replaced it with a PROD, because it doesn't fit under A1. Just FYI, A7 is the tag to use regarding concerns of notability, which I believe was your intention based on your edit summary. However, neologisms do not fit under that category. Keep up the new page patrol, Fingerz 00:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Woland333
11/23/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woland333 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I created a Paul Rish page. Can you critique it and give me some suggests? I just have it under my user page right now. —Preceding undated comment added 22:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC).
- The subject's notability is not established from third-party reliable sources, which means that in its current state the article will probably not survive a deletion discussion, and may even be deleted without discussion. Rish's candidacy should be referenced, at the very least, from the Macon Telegraph, and preferably the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Furthermore, the whole page looks like an electoral tract for his candidacy, something that is frowned on.
- Try building the article entirely from sources over which Rish or the Republican Party does not have any editorial input whatsoever, and none of which are blogs. (Macon.com being a blog, it is not acceptable as a source.) -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank You for reviewing my article! I am busy reworking it. However, Macon.com is the official website of the Macon Telegraph. It even says so at the bottom of the Macon Telegraph Wikipedia page. The article written by Travis Fain on Macon.com is the exact one that ran in the Telegraph.
- On another note, paulrish.com was the best source i found for biographical information. But I can't use it because Rish's campaign has editorial control over it. Right? Thank you again! --Woland333 (talk) 22:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- Right. It is Rish's own site, so we cannot tell whether the information found there is accurate. Don't forget, since he's on an election campaign, he set out to make himself look good on his own site. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Forship article again
Hello Blanchardb! I guess you'll remember that one month ago you've helped me to revise the Forship article, improving its text and references in order to better comply with Wikipedia's criteria for notability and verifiability, and therefore abort a speedy deletion process. Well, approximately at the same time there was a similar questioning in the Portuguese Wikipedia, where I have created an equivalent article: pt:Forship Engenharia. There, the argument involved also the fact (brought up by myself) that I work in Forship, as an Engineering Director. After some argument, which was beggining to get hot and personal, with an editor called Gunnex, and to avoid a potential war of editions, I have taken the initiative to propose a process of elimination by voting, to bring the discussion to a wider community decision. The final result, after two weeks of voting, was favorable to the maintenance of the article, since the majority of editors considered that in spite of the fact that I work in Forship, there was no impeditive COI and all applicable Wikipedia criteria were fulfilled. Eventually, all tags (notability, verifiability and COI), were removed by admins... The reason to ask for your help once more is that Gunnex (being, as myself, editor of both en: and pt: Wikipedias) simultaneously included a COI tag to the English article. I have decided, at that time, to wait the closure of the voting process in pt:Wiki before taking any action in en:Wiki. Now that the issue is solved there, I am asking your advise about the best approach to follow. Is the decision taken in pt:Wiki sufficient to solve the COI questioning in en:Wiki? Could you deliberate about it and (in case you agree with the decision taken by pt:Wiki editors) eliminate the COI tag? Should I follow the same path and propose a similar elimination by voting process (I'm not even sure if this is also of normal use in en:Wiki) here? Can you please advise me on the subject? I am sorry to bother you with this long explanation and request, but I was not able to summarize it further... Please feel free to request more information or clarification, if needed. I thank you in advance. Rgds. Antonio Prates (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that at this point, the only thing for you to do is to wait and see. The COI tag means that the article has been edited, for the most part, by someone involved, in this case, you. Given that the article has survived a deletion discussion in the Portuguese Wikipedia, it is likely to survive one here as well, and you are allowed, even encouraged, to bring up the discussion in the Portuguese Wikipedia if no one else does.
- But as for the COI tag, I guess you should wait for the article to be expanded by someone uninvolved. Remember that there is no deadline in Wikipedia. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 14:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, Blanchardb. I will do as you suggest. Thanks for your advise. Antonio Prates (talk) 00:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Help Knowledge Arena
Why am I forbidden to creaete a topic on knowledge Arena and why have my edits to Conccept maps been removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ray Oaks (talk • contribs) 16:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please see our guidelines on articles about neologisms. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- What you need to show is that the term is already accepted by the community at large, as evidenced by usage by people other than McAleese. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Confusion
1. earlier to-day I obtained a Wikipedia user name 2. I wished to add to / edit an article "Concept Maps" 3. I did so 4. The edits have been removed 5. I wish to add to what is know about concept maps with reference to a term used to describe the process by whcih they are created i.e. Knowledge arena 6. this term has not been used so far in W.
a. why I am being denied edits to concept maps b. by whom c. why can't I create a new topic?
There is too much help to help me !! :-) - I need simple advice on how to achieve the above 2. & 5.
Can you help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ray Oaks (talk • contribs) 16:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- It looks to me like who ever removed your additions at Concept maps reinserted them. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so far Concept Maps/ Knowledge arena
OK thank you for detecting that!! - They have been re-instated. I have checked. Does this mean I can continue to develop the area of concept mapping with reference to the term "Knowledge Arena"? I need to add a few more brief articles - including graphics - that are required to show why the previous edit to concept maps is substantial and fair etc. It is my intention to develop what is known about the area using published sources as references etc
If I can go ahead taking note of the various guidelines - just say - Go ahead !! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ray Oaks (talk • contribs) 16:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
About Véronique Billat:
About Véronique Billat:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov search on PubMed U.S. National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, you can find some off the 100 scientist publication
etc...
She was one off the most famous scientist about sport practise and this works are usefull in all sport. Soccer, running, swimming, cycling, Mountaineering etc... She also work for some therapy and study about genetic muscle illness..
Look also on french wiki and you can see all the occurency about this work
Thank's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurent colas (talk • contribs) 22:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Too late. As for your references: in Google, lots of stuff by Billat, but next to nothing about her. (That's what counts.) Youtube is not regarded as a reliable source, since anyone can upload material there. As for the French Wikpedia, what you have shown is that she's been cited as a source for four articles, and that hardly qualifies as "famous" or even "notable." -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Tates Creek Baptist Church
I'm new at this and I believe this church to hold historical significance to the development of religious freedom and ultimately play a small part in the freedom of America from British rule. This is new to me, so I'm doing my research and trying my best to properly lay out this page. Please give me some pointers and please, please don't delete me. I'm trying here, I'm not trying to push God on you or advertise anything, just history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HorseTrooper859 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- The fact the building is listed in the National Register of Historic Places did it for me. Thanks. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Véronique Billat
Search yourself about her in english google
This is not because you dont know her that she is not realy famous. To know this person it was necesssary to study sport physiological at high level or to bee a very good form conditioning coach.
She's famous in all off world in physiological speciality , and all form conditioning trainer's use the result off 15 years off physiological research and study.
an exemple off US webpage speeking about her job in athletiq training:
Something is funny , she is more famous in sport training in USA than in France... And english wiki dont permit to create a personal page speeking about his study anr research.
Something mysterious but not realy important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurent colas (talk • contribs) 22:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
sandbox move
Hey, thanks for setting me straight! Drmies (talk) 03:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Great News!!!
Unable to resist bacon's temptations, rogue editors have kicked off the Bacon Challenge 2010 before the New Year even starts! This is a fun and collegial event and all are welcome. There are many non-pork articles for editors who enjoy some sizzle, but object to or don't like messing with pig products. This year's event also includes a Bacon WikiCup 2010 for those who may want to keep score and enjoy engaging in friendly competition. Given the critical importance of this subject matter, I know you will want to participate, so remember to sign up today and get started A.S.A.P. ALL ARE WELCOME!!! The more the merrier. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
PROD of No berlusconi day
I removed the prod because it seems to be notable based on google news results. While the article isn't well written, I will put it on my to-do list. If you object, feel free to post why on my talk page, and/or nominate this at WP:AFD. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 22:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Would you mind having another look at this article? I confess I'm baffled -- not by you, I hasten to add. When I speedied this it was apparently by the artist listed in the infobox on the right, something-Yung, who only briefly had an article which was speedied for non-notability. Now this album's body copy suggests that it's by someone named Lil Brother -- I can only find a redirect for that name with an apostrophe added. What it looks like to me is that someone has copied an article about Lil Brother for format and forgotten to change the names, but frankly it could be just about anything, because the assertions about the album itself seem to be radically different than the article I speedied. Part of the article seems to be saying that the album has been released, and part of it that it won't be released until next year. I'm not actually sure which artist it is whom you're suggesting has an article in the most recent edit summary. Please give me the benefit of your thinking. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- The link to the artist was incorrect. It should have been to Yung VL, and I made the necessary correction. Now I've taken a look at the article on the artist, and even though I don't think it would survive an AfD, it is not speedable IMO, given this artist's label. Perhaps a group AfD is in order here. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate that; I think I get what's going on (sort of). I am leaning towards the view that Yung VL is speediable -- a previous version seemingly was -- but I'll consider it carefully given your opinion. Much obliged for your extra trouble. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- As near as I can tell by going to the MySpace page which is the "official" page of UTP Records (and to the Wikipedia page), this individual isn't associated with that label. His stated age of 17 makes me very skeptical of how the facts seem to be very fluid here; I think an AfD will sort it all out. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)\
- Thanks, I appreciate that; I think I get what's going on (sort of). I am leaning towards the view that Yung VL is speediable -- a previous version seemingly was -- but I'll consider it carefully given your opinion. Much obliged for your extra trouble. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Yung VL, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung VL. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Dick Clark
I saw that you deleted my recent addition to the Dick Clark article and I do not mind at all. It was one of those "spur of the moment" edits that at the time I thought would add clarity to the article but on reflection I realize that it really added nothing at all. The first time I saw the Dick Clark article I was appalled and shocked to note there was no mention at all of his Saturday night TV show from the 1950's, which in my opinion had as much an impact upon American culture as did "American Bandstand". I did the intial edits adding that paragraph, which I was pleased to see was later expanded upon by persons much more expert on the life of Mr. Clark than I am. OOPS! I didn't realize that I wasn't "signed in" when I did the most recent edit. Sorry about that! Nghtownclerk (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)nghtownclerk December 9, 2009
Ajax Academy
How is the Ajax Academy not famed? It has produced some of the best players in the world, like Sjaak Swart, Johan Cruijff, Johan Neeskens, Frank Rijkaard, Dennis Bergkamp, Frank de Boer, Ronald de Boer, Edgar Davids, Clarence Seedorf, Patrick Kluivert, Rafael van der Vaart, Wesley Sneijder, and Gregory van der Wiel. It is internationally known as the model for youth academies. See:
- http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/clubfootball/news/newsid=627320.html
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/sportacademy/hi/sa/football/features/newsid_2858000/2858785.stm
The message you left me was rather offensive, it's not like I'm vandalising Wikipedia. 77.250.200.70 (talk) 15:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Take a look at WP:PEACOCK. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
The message you left me was rather offensive, it's not like I'm vandalising Wikipedia. 77.250.200.70 (talk) 15:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- The fact that it is so famous is of extremely important encyclopedic value, since most readers will have no knowledge of the fact that the Ajax Academy is any more important than the Chelsea Academy (for example). The Chelsea Academy has in fact been modeled on the Ajax academy, and has been implemented by Piet de Visser and Henk ten Cate (well until Grant was fired). The Barcelona academy was totally based on the Ajax Academy and was implemented when Cruyff was manager there. These are historical facts and it's not like I'm some kind of marketing executive from Dubai trying to say that Manchester City has the best academy ever. Incidentally, the Ajax Academy in it's current form was originally set up by Rinus Michels, who is credited with the invention of a major football tactic known as "Total Football" (as played by Ajax, Barcelona, and Arsenal today) and was named "coach of the century" by FIFA in 1999.[3] It is not a peacock term if it has been widely recognised and acknowledged and can be referenced by multiple sources like the BBC and Fifa. 77.250.200.70 (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- "Famed Ajax Academy" links:
- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/27/sports/soccer/27iht-SOCCER.html
- http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/thomas-vermaelen-wenger-pulls-another-rabbit-out-of-the-hat-1804821.html
- http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/arsenals-troubles-matched-by-ajax-508520.html
- http://www.sigma-sports.net/newsEvents/youngAjaxTalent.html
- http://www.sportingindex.com/extra-spread/sports-zone/top-ten-great-teams.htm
- http://www.caughtoffside.com/2009/08/29/everton-agree-5m-fee-for-dutch-international-heitinga/ ... direct quote from the article: 25 year old Heitinga is a product of the famed Ajax academy.
- Those are just the result of five minutes googling "famed Ajax Academy"... BTW, your edit left a grammatical error in the article. 77.250.200.70 (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- No, I just don't think people will look into those. I won't. As I said earlier, the word "famed" brings a connotation of undue importance. Whether or not you think that importance is undue is irrelevant: you use of the word carries that negative stigma whether you like it or not, and whether or not it is deserved.
- And that is precisely why Wikipedia has introduced the WP:PEACOCK guideline in the first place. Believe me, "Ajax Academy" (with internal link) is a lot better than "famed Ajax Academy." -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Having read WP:PEACOCK, I'm not convinced that you understand its meaning. It's not like I'm speculating that the Ajax Academy is so great. It's that reputable organisations like The New York Times, The BBC, FIFA, The Independant, The Herald Tribune, and others have stated that it is a "famed" academy. When so many reputable organisations agree, it should be safe to include it in Wikipedia. 16:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- And what I'm telling you is that the average reader will get the impression that you are speculating that the Ajax Academy is so great. Even if you're not. Actually, especially if you're not. Do you get my point? -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- A widely-held opinion is still an opinion, but by writing "famed Ajax Academy" in Wikipedia you are putting it over as fact, which still violates WP:PEACOCK. "Ajax Academy" is better then "famed Ajax Academy". If you want to elaborate, don't state that it is famed, but demonstrate why it is famed. --Jameboy (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- And what I'm telling you is that the average reader will get the impression that you are speculating that the Ajax Academy is so great. Even if you're not. Actually, especially if you're not. Do you get my point? -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- Having read WP:PEACOCK, I'm not convinced that you understand its meaning. It's not like I'm speculating that the Ajax Academy is so great. It's that reputable organisations like The New York Times, The BBC, FIFA, The Independant, The Herald Tribune, and others have stated that it is a "famed" academy. When so many reputable organisations agree, it should be safe to include it in Wikipedia. 16:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- And that is precisely why Wikipedia has introduced the WP:PEACOCK guideline in the first place. Believe me, "Ajax Academy" (with internal link) is a lot better than "famed Ajax Academy." -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Since you participated in the third AFD, I am letting you know about the 4th AFD. Ikip (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Linda Jackson
Hi I didn't appreciate your nomination of Linda Jackson (designer). If you look at my work, including The Pheasantry which I created from scratch, including photos, and in Granny Takes a Trip and other articles such as Jenny Kee, you see I am creating a lot material on designers and the counterculture of the 1960s. I still have work to do on the Jackson article - she was a business partner of Jenny Kee who is undoubtedly notable (there is a film appearing about her next year) and she has featured in exhibitions at the V&A. Obviously I need to do some further research on Linda and I don't appreciate having to store it on my own computer in case it is deleted. Could you please wait a bit until I consolidate the article. West one girl (talk) 16:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Billy Faier
Billy Faier worked with Seeger, travelled with Woody, recorded Dylan, played with John Sebastian and other, influenced thousands of folk singers and musicians. Whoah there on the delete button, buddy. --scruss (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- As I said on the article's talk page, if I take a look at your article, I get the impression that the only person who thinks Faier is influential is Faier himself. You need to show that Faier was notable independently of the people you mentioned here. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Never saw anything from you on the talk page, as the whole shebang was deleted before I could get to it. Anyway, fixed now. --scruss (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
You can't drop words from a direct quote! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nancy Meier (talk • contribs) 17:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Are you a real person or a machine? You can't drop words from a direct quote! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nancy Meier (talk • contribs) 17:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
You violated 3RR. If you undo back to my last edit, I won't report you. Qikr (talk) 17:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Can you handle a WP:MEAT investigation? The timing of your edits is suspicious. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, please accused me when you're guilty. Bye! Qikr (talk) 17:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I'm done editing that article, so have it your way. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NJA (t/c) 19:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Benny, please don't take this personally, but I gave you a chance to back off and you didn't take it. You were wrong about direct quotes, wrong to edit war and wrong to accuse me of vandalism. Mostly, you were wrong to think you could just get away with it again. I mean this in the most civil way, but you are a very aggressive editor, which sometimes crosses the line into bullying, especially when you take a bite out of noobs. I hope this helps you understand that Wikipedia is for people who play nice. If not, your next block will be even longer and more frustrating. Have a nice life. Qikr (talk) 04:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
FYI
You may wish to read this. Kiwiteen123 Please reply on my talk page 22:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- That's kinda unlikely; he's blocked for 24 hours. HalfShadow 22:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I'm aware you can still read wikipedia when you are blocked. Kiwiteen123 Please reply on my talk page 22:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- I was referring to the 'reply on my page' thing. *cough* HalfShadow 22:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- It is my understanding that a 24 hour block means that, you can't edit for 24 hours. I'm pretty sure you can edit after that again. Kiwiteen123 Please reply on my talk page 01:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- The "reply on my page" thing is Kiwiteen's standard signature. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 06:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I'm aware you can still read wikipedia when you are blocked. Kiwiteen123 Please reply on my talk page 22:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
hi , I am trying to create a space to complement the article of the province of Toronto. It is right that this topic is not discussed seriously at the moment, but I do not find better way to offer solutions for the oversize population of Ontario in respect to the other provinces.
Even if I personally believe that Toronto and the rest of Ontario will do better separate, I just want create a space of reference for people whit any opinion about this possibility. Can you propose a better format for this Idea?
Sincerely Lys de Quebec
- Because there are several proposals for the partition of Ontario, the most notable being one that draws the border roughly across Algonquin Park, there can be no way to include information about a nonexistent province without it amounting to speculation. This said, unless you have solid sources that are not connected with either the partition movement or the opposition thereof, your analysis qualifies as original research and cannot be included in Wikipedia. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 06:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Sandbox
- :-D -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 20:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Regarding VisualCron page
Hi Blanchard,
we did you propose the VisualCron page for deletion? I am still working on this article page. It is an application being used by a lot of users in the area Task_Scheduler.
Please remove the deletion or advise me what to change. I expect to finalize the page today.
best regards,
deserialized —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deserialized (talk • contribs) 16:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Can you provide a reliable third-party reference to back up your assertion that it is used by a lot of people? Something like a review in an authoritative magazine or webzine... -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
deserialized - not sure how to reply here as I am fairly new to this. There is a review in IT World Canada which is both online and in their magazines here: http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/the-demo-automate-anything-with-visualcron/136479
VisualCron is also available on all download sites. I would say it is a nisch market but it is definitely in top 3 schedulers/automation tools. It is smaller but comparable to Automate and ActiveBatch listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Job_scheduler
I promise to improve the page and give non-biased information about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deserialized (talk • contribs) 16:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, that seems to be good enough. I must tell you, however, that links to download sites are frowned on by the Wikipedia community. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
deserialized - ok, thanks for the feedback —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deserialized (talk • contribs) 16:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: NOTA (Vocal)
Hello Blanchardb, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of NOTA (Vocal) - a page you tagged - because: SPeedy declined. Won a seemingly major competetion is a credible assertion of notability. PROD or take to AfD if required. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. GedUK 20:43, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- My bad. I missed that part. Thanks. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
I found plenty of sources. Joe Chill (talk) 01:54, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Re: Ndembezi
I can identify the language and the subject, yes. It's a blurb about a locale in Tanzania or something therein if I'm not mistaken. No context or anything though. There wouldn't be a translator for that language online though, I'd imagine. Zelse81 (talk) 04:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, that's good enough. It's just that we don't tag foreign-language pages for speedy deletion when we have no idea what they're saying, that's all. :-) -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 04:54, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
I declined your speedy deletion request because it makes claims of notability. I converted it to a prod instead. LadyofShalott 03:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Perfect. I've added it to my watchlist, and will monitor it for addition of references, etc. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
CiReReBoT1928
Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CR1928 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Please read our notability guidelines for people and tell us which one of these does this person meet. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
It was made in the wizard. Thank you. Iongatherer (talk) 04:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
your
It is about the same as if you owned the only newspaper in the world, each commanded you what they can and can not write, and yet you said that your country is freedom of speech. You hypocrite, who, like your country (if you're a citizen of the United States) - still say that your country's freedom, while you are on the verge of a fascist dictatorship, which reconciles own people, censors the media manipulates public opinion and all under the guise of protection " freedom " --Fredy.00 (talk) 18:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- I think you missed my point. You can create an account at Blogspot. I mean, you can, so don't bring up a hypothetical situation where it would not be possible. That's where your opinions should be stated in accordance with your First Amendment rights. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Sir. please get a life and stop deleteing my articlesDrkylelambert (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand why you declined the speedy. Could you please explain? The pages appeared to have the exact same title and content. If it is my mistake and I'm missing a policy, I apologize. PrincessofLlyr (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- One is a plausible redirect to the other. See WP:REDIRECT. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Generation 25
Just delete it already, I've admitted I was making it all up twice. --CF90 (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Paul Dunay
Why do you want to delete Paul Dunay? He seems notable and every paragraph in the article is sourced. I worked hard on that article and it seems like everyone hates it. Dharokowns (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- All of the references you used only qualify as primary sources. You should try redoing the article from scratch using only references over which neither Dunay nor his publisher, agent, etc. have any control whatsoever. Preferably, such sources should be reputable newspapers, marketing journals, etc. but not in the blog sections. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 14:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Can I have some more time to find better sources then? Dharokowns (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- The deletion discussion normally lasts seven days. That should give you plenty of time. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)