Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dani Daniels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Daniels

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clickbait and incidental coverage are not a basis to maintain a BLP. Hosting an amazon prime series is interesting but suggests all the coverage we need should be on that page as long as its shown to pass GNG Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Keep Several AVN award wins. Oaktree b (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Porn industry awards are no longer enough to establish notability since WP:PORNBIO was deprecated. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we have stopped treating pornography industry awards as conferring notability since they are just a marketing ploy, so this article no longer meets inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete awards are deemed non-notable, sources are the usual spam of avn and xbiz, plus a few interviews. Zaathras (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.