Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend Zone 2: Dangerous Area

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved to Draft:Friend Zone 2: Dangerous Area. BD2412 T 01:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Friend Zone 2: Dangerous Area (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

too soon, short article and need reference PradaSaetiew (talk) 21:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It would have also been better if concerns raised were discussed on the page's talk page and WP:BEFORE was done. Other articles being AFD'ed in relation to this are Devil Sister, Military of Love, The Gifted: Graduation‎, Oh My Boss, Wake Up Ladies: Very Complicated and A Tale of Thousand Stars. — Emperork (talk) 03:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Too soon and not Notability.--PradaSaetiew (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify group until release -- I think these shows will all meet notability if they debut as scheduled, especially given the references that Emperork (talk · contribs) has put together. I think the best solution would be to Draftify them as a group, and then move back into main space as they debut. I will not put the comment on all of the pages, because that seems redundant, and the nominator should have done a batched nomination in this case. Emperork, thanks for informally linking them yourself. matt91486 (talk) 10:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question for Matt91486 (talk · contribs): Do you know the premiere dates for these, or just sometime in 2020? It looks like they were announced in late 2019. If the premieres are really soon, then I think no problem on voting Keep for them — if it's going to be a while, or some of them have been delayed because of Covid (as many US shows have been) then maybe keep them in draft until there's a confirmed airdate. Do you know what the plans are? Thanks, — Toughpigs (talk) 21:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Okay, that works for me. The only real rationale for deletion is TOOSOON, and nobody actually knows how soon it will be. No point in deleting the articles without a rationale. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BEAMALEXANDER25, talk 01:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.