- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep as the reasons for deletion have been rebutted with the improvements as noted in the reasons for retention. –MuZemike 00:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Juan Gotti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Completely unverified BLP article. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 05:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All albums and/or singles are not notable. Hasn't won any awards or anything like that. Minimac (talk) 06:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails WP:BAND. Armbrust Talk Contribs 07:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and above. GregJackP (talk) 13:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- He's had coverage in plenty of reliable sources, and I've added 8 citations just now. Billboard called him "one of the pioneers of the West Coast Latin rap movement", and he's received many award nominations. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Paul Erik has greatly improved the article. A Latin Grammy nomination alone is a default keep for WP:BIO as far as I'm concerned. — Scientizzle 19:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.