Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalbakken (station)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 12:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, not linked to one of the other stations--entirely minutiae— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmaguir1 (talk • contribs)
- Keep, unless you want to AfD all the other railway station stubs as well. This is part of a series on Oslo railway stations. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 00:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, all of them should be AfD'd if they're not notable like this one isn't.-Kmaguir1 00:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A translation of this might be useful in the discussion at this point. Uncle G 01:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, past precedent has been very clear to include all subway and railway stations. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, major subway systems like the London Underground and New York Subway have individual station articles, and deleting the ones in Oslo as "non notable" would contribute to systematic bias. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Minutiae? Punkmorten 06:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.