Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaori Oinuma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kaori Oinuma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a Japanese-Filipina model who came eighth in a Big Brother series and has done some other early-career stuff, none of which looks notable to me. Mccapra (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The references are insufficient to meet GNG. This is really a case of WP:TOOSOON for this starlet. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect is a good possibility, since she did get some media attention and is mentioned in the Pinoy Big Brother: Otso article. I also would accept deletion per arguments of nominator. Polyglot Researcher (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Added a few more reliable sources in the article. Her TV roles seem significant, including 3 main TV roles. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NACTOR. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: passes NACTOR as she has multiple significant roles. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 21:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per all the above. Also, links to WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. The article passes both. AnotherEditor144^{talk contribs} 17:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article must have many information including on about her early life before her stardom in Philippine showbiz. Jayjay2020 (talk) 07:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see more refs have been added but they’re all just passing mentions of her name in cast lists. Where is the in-depth coverage in multiple sources? She’s verifiably an actress and appeared on Big Brother. That’s really all we’ve got. Mccapra (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow scrutiny of sources added since last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She received significant coverage from at least three different secondary sources: Manila Standart, ABS and Cand Mag. I have doubts about her relevance in PBB: Otso, but I have no doubts that the article meets WP: GNG. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She is notable. She has played main roles in multiple films and television series, so meets WP:NACTOR and has received significant coverage in reliable sources. --Ashley yoursmile! 18:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.