- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 07:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable political forum, no claim of notability is made. Wikipedia is NOT a soapbox. RWR8189 21:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep
- First of all, it is a notable political forum.
- Secondly, you could have brought your concerns up on the talk page prior to invoking an unnecessary afd debate/vote, especially since this article has been up for several weeks without anyone else expressing concern over its notability.
Ruthfulbarbarity 21:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, here is some site information,
- Traffic Rank 18,864.
- Sites Linking To LP: 879
- Plus, it has been in existence for almost four years, and has traffic that dwarfs some of the other weblogs/political forums that have Wikipedia articles devoted to them.
Ruthfulbarbarity 22:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete minor, non-notable political discussion group. Akradecki 22:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, this is not advertising.
- I didn't create this article-contrary to your assertion-in order to promote Liberty Post, or to generate traffic for the website itself.
- I did so because it is a moderately popular political website, which I thought deserved to have an entry.
- For the very same reason, I expanded the stub on Freedom Underground, even though that site is much less popular, and-by the same criterion used to flag this article for deletion-notable.
Ruthfulbarbarity 22:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the heads up on Freedom Underground, I have also listed it for deletion.--RWR8189 22:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You seem to be quite the deletionist.
- Good luck pruning.
- You're going to have your hands full.
Ruthfulbarbarity 23:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Another website, that has been the subject of two previously unsuccessful afd attempts, which-according to your criteria-is of dubious notability.
- I'll try to link to a few hundred more so that you'll fulfill your quota today.
- As is (no references or citations), delete per WP:V. -AED 00:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Doesn't an Alexa rank of 18,000 indicate that it's quite popular? Drett 01:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's been over five days since this afd nomination was made.
- So can we safely assume that this debate is closed?
Ruthfulbarbarity 06:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.