Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logi Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logi Entertainment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to meet WP:N. Have not been able to find any sources in English or Korean to establish notability. Lenoresm (talk) 14:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 16:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 16:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 08:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletedelete, signifant RS coverage not found. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:32, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article fails WP:N and it's only source is Korean Wikipedia, which is against policy to use as a source. The article tells a reader essentially nothing of value about the company other then it exists and the names of some current and former affiliated people. I was unable to find any reliable sources in Korean or English demonstrating notability either. This article seems more promotional then anything, since it's sole purpose seems to be letting English speakers know the company exists and how to check it out (by going to their website). Nothing encyclopedic or even just informative is learned from the article. The only source on their Korean Wikipedia page is their own website as well. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.