Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Borg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm Borg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. The CEOs of an organization can be notable, but there is no evidence that this particular one is. See also the adjacent AfD on his son. DGG ( talk ) 03:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 15:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Many available sources and therefore meets WP:BASIC:
    • Sabik, Cathy A. "The Borg Equation" Business Journal of New Jersey 3.12 (Aug 1986): 56.
    • Burgher, Valerie. "The last man standing" Mediaweek 7.31 (Aug 18, 1997): 6.
    • Clifford, Stephanie. "A Battle With a Newspaper Backfires" New York Times, Late Edition (East Coast) [New York, N.Y] 04 May 2009: B.7.
    • Pinsdorf, Marion K. Communicating when Your Company is Under Siege: Surviving Public Crisis 3rd ed.: 153-155[1]
    • Kurtz, Howard "A bad case of the '80s" Columbia Journalism Review 31.5 (Jan 1993): 38.
This is just a sampling. --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.