Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayyar Sultana filmography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G5) by Ponyo. nac –Davey2010^Talk 17:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nayyar Sultana filmography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferneced filmography with no sources at all Wgolf (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep deletion is not cleanup and this notable actor has an extensive filmography. --Jakob (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it's not unreferenced. --Jakob (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The refs were not there when I put this up. (Also they had to be removed then as apparently that's a site that's not allowed for wiki refs) Wgolf (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, you're right. It's the kind of thing that should have an article, but if there aren't sources, there aren't sources. Weak delete. --Jakob (talk) 00:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This list is attributed to the following 3 websites as sources: pakmdb.com, mazhar.dk, and pak101.com. Where can one find guidance on the reliability of these sites? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The websites listed in the article aren't even Reliable sources, I can't find evidence of notability so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 22:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the websites as as I said above they're not RS. –Davey2010^Talk 22:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Davey2010-I have put prods up on quite a few more of these made by the same user. Wgolf (talk) 22:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Corr you've been busy!

–Davey2010^Talk 22:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice, due to lack of reliable sources. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the far more comprehensive Nayyar Sultana#Filmography. As her work can be sourced to the films themselves and in HER article provides context and content, we have no need for a separate unsourced article which mostly lists those other persons involved in her films. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and if necessary merge as MQS suggests. This should be the default way of handling theses, unless there is too much material to cover in the main article--which will be true only in very exceptional cases. The reader is almost always likely to look for this material in connection with the bio, and is best served by keeping it together. DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.