Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Deshais

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Deshais

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:BEFORE test, almost entirely sourced by primary/non-third party sources. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Oregon, and Washington. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with nom. Also, I don't see any work that could be used to argue for WP:NAUTHOR. -- asilvering (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to poor sourcing; the article could potentially be moved to drafts if the creator wanted to pursue fixing the article. It is also unclear to me if the article creator has a COI (they haven't responded to a COI notice). Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:40, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - regardless of the COI issue, simply does not meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.