Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehman Azhar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rehman Azhar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't meet WP:GNG. Saqib (talk) 13:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Power~enwiki (talk) 19:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why ? --Saqib (talk) 07:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I feel like some case needs to be made here. The article has been the subject of several edit wars but no real change over the past 5 years. There are no links cited as references but 13 links at the end of the article, none currently useful. The article reads as a personal bio. Overall, it's a very low-quality article, and should possibly be reduced to a 1-paragraph stub. But I can't support a case for deletion of this article unless somebody who reads Urdu can check for notability in that language. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yashovardhan (talk) 06:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If he is notable, it is not verifiable at this stage. If an Urdu reader proves this wrong at some point in the future, then this article can be re-created. It does not appear to have an Urdu-language Wikipedia article and I cannot find sources to verify notability, nor is notability clear from this article. MartinJones (talk) 07:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - none of the references point to anything notable if to anything at all.--Rpclod (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment after a few more weeks of the AfD process, I no longer support my previous Keep vote here, and remain neutral. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.