Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rendition (text adventure game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments (non-admin closure) czar · · 14:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rendition (text adventure game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No mainstream coverage, relies entirely on coverage from a non-notable art show. Nowhere appropriate to merge or redirect the page to. Freikorp (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator due to addition of several references. Freikorp (talk) 07:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The fact that the game has been discussed by notable text adventure authors and writers including Jon Ingold and Emily Short certainly suggests that the work is noteworthy. It also seems to have been discussed by Nick Montfort at the 2009 Digital Arts and Culture Conference (citation not currently in the article). I'm not as familiar with Ingold, but Short and Montfort are definitely big-name established experts in their field and they've been published in numerous third party RSes. So I think several of the sources here can probably be considered reliable under WP:SPS. This game might not be as notable as some of the blockbuster titles coming out for modern genres, but I'm inclined to err on the side of inclusion due to the attention it seems to have received from these big names in the field. -Thibbs (talk) 19:26, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.