Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Curtis Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Curtis Brown

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor. No evidence of sources that could improve this article. Article is a mirror of IMDB, and is also the article’s only (unreliable) source. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even close to enough sourcing to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:12, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While he's not a big name actor, he has had some notable roles, plus a prolific theater career as well, where he's received favorable notices, see source #1. Apparently, he won a Drama-Logue Award for The Heidi Chronicles also, but still trying to find a RS for that. There are also multiple instances of him getting significant coverage in newspapers, so meets the GNG in my view. 1, 2, 3 GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 00:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject's 56-episode stint in Search for Tomorrow, his recurring roles in various TV series and his film appearances are sufficient for the purposes of WP:NACTOR. The sources that GoldenAgeFan1 has located demonstrate that WP:GNG is met, too. There are also countless passing mentions in reliable news outlets like Variety and New York Times. With some work, this could be a very well-sourced article. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject passes WP:GNG with the multiple WP:SIGCOV sources which are mentioned by GoldenAgeFan1. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.