- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sapucaí-Mirim. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sapucaí Mirim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is exactly one sentence long. One other article links to this one in a way that if this article were AfD'd, no change in meaning or content would occur. Also, the last addition of substantial content to this article occurred in April 2007. APerson241 (talk!) 19:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Redirect - I can't tell for sure, but this may be the exact same thing as Sapucaí-Mirim, in which case redirecting there would be sensible. Otherwise, it's non-notable and non-important, and so should be deleted. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 20:32, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The two articles are the same thing. Sapucaí Mirim should be a redirect. APerson241 (talk!) 21:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 21:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy redirect, obviously. Nothing in the nomination remotely resembles a valid reason for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.