- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sligh and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U/G Madness. Individual Magic decks not notable, as Wikipedia is not a strategy guide. (This one never even won a major tournament.) Features one of my favorite bullet points on Wikipedia: "The deck was widely considered fun to play." Andrew Levine 09:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Andrew Levine 09:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a game guide or a repository of links, and it is not the Magic website or any other Magic strategy website. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 10:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Coredesat. wikipediatrix 14:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, I am owned. You might save time if you view my contribs and systematically AFD them. NorrYtt 21:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't take it personally. One's contributions to Wikipedia are not simply measured by the number of articles they created. Andrew Levine 11:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article describes something that would be better mentioned in one of the archetype articles. --Akhonji 18:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.