Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vamanrao Deshpande

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. in reviewing the discussion which has already been relisted twice, there's really no consensus one way or the other. There's a well based keep !vote and a generic delete !vote. With that being said, I see no reason that this couldn't be speedily renominated if the nom wishes. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vamanrao Deshpande

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are indications of success and perhaps some level of WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG, but I couldn't establish it. It has been tagged for notability for almost seven years, so needs a discussion. It is difficult with the non-English language articles, so maybe someone else can prove it. It has no Hindi article, or an article in any other languages for me to glean info from. Boleyn (talk) 10:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The following provide sufficient indication I think that he is notable in real world terms: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. It could really do with input from editors who have access to Indian sources. If we can't find more coverage we may need to reduce it to a stub, but I feel that would be better than deletion. --Michig (talk) 10:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A borderline case of notability, but doesn't seem to be enough for people to improve the page. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 21:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.