Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 14

< October 13	October 15 >

October 14

File:RAF St Eval.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAF St Eval.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

British Government image made in 1975 is still under Copyright because Crown Copyright lasts for 50 years Rcbutcher (talk) 01:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:BC Electric Building plaque.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ ^xplicit 01:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting note: Original nominated removed by Twinkle malfunction. — ξ ^xplicit 01:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Syria News Channel Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Syria News Channel Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploader very unlikely to own the copyright for the Syria News Channel's logo. Eeekster (talk) 01:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Amanda Todd - 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: wrong venue. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanda Todd - 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File taken from a news website. No indication this is fair use. This is not a unique historic image. mboverload@ 14:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The news service seems to have cropped one of her Facebook images -- 70.24.247.66 (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you're confusing "freely licensed" with "Fair use". "Fair use" is, as Wikipedia uses it, a reference to the US legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material by those that do not own the copyright under a specific set of circumstances. So long as the image meets Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, the image is considered "fair use" and can be used in an article. If you wish to contest that it falls under the NFCC, please refile at WP:FfD with your reasoning. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:51, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SMK Kota Kemuning Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SMK Kota Kemuning Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Invalid PD reason. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as nominated. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Circuit analogy water pipes big.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circuit analogy water pipes big.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image is tagged {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} and is taken from [1]. The source site's copyright and licenses page [2] says, "You may use images we have created (and only those images - indicated on the website by the credit "Image courtesy of Windows to the Universe" or "Windows to the Universe Original") as long as you credit Windows to the Universe as indicated below and license your new creations under these identical terms (a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License)." The copyright and licenses page goes on to say, "There are also images on our website that we have permission to use from others, indicated by the credit line for those images. We cannot give you permission to use those images…". Unfortunately, there is no image credit to "Windows to the Universe" on the source page; the only credit I see is "Last modified February 17, 2009 by Randy Russell." So it's not clear that this image is indeed licensed under the stated Creative Commons license. —Bkell (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Del Turco 1981.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Del Turco 1981.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tagged with {{PD-Italy}}, which says, "If this image meets the definition of a simple photograph and was created prior to 1976 and published without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989, then it was out of copyright in Italy on the date of restoration (January 1, 1996) and is currently in the public domain in the United States (17 U.S.C. § 104A)." But the description says that this photograph was taken in 1981, so these conditions seem not to be met. —Bkell (talk) 19:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alessandro Natta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alessandro Natta.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The source, [3], mentions a book from 1996, but does not tell when the photo was taken. It is possible that the photo might have been taken too recently for {{PD-Italy}} to apply. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Berlusconi 1984.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlusconi 1984.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo taken in 1984 (according to the file name). Since it was taken after 1975, it is currently copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I got it from the Italian Wikipedia. If anyone speaks Italian and wants to go check out its copyright status on the Italian Wikipedia, go for it. Zweifel (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The issue is that the photo is in the public domain in Italy but not in the United States. English Wikipedia uses United States copyright law, while Italian Wikipedia might be more permissible when it comes to photos which are free in Italy. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:21, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gráinne Mulvey (composer). Portrait by Eugene Langan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gráinne Mulvey (composer). Portrait by Eugene Langan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Not sure about this one - throwing up for discussion - This is the sourced permission http://www.cmc.ie/press/images/comp.cfm?composerID=88 and links to http://www.cmc.ie/press/images/photo_detail.cfm?imageID=81 - does not say "Public Domain" or "Creative Commons" - just says "All these images may be downloaded and reused provided appropriate acknowledgement is included with the images. For details on the wording of these acknowledgements, please view the image detail." To me, it's quite a bit less than is usually required for WP inclusion - does the re-use allow commercial? We don't know. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have always thought that a permission to re-use an image allows you to re-use the image both commercially and non-commercially unless otherwise specified, but I'm aware that other people sometimes think otherwise, although I haven't figured out why. However, the main issue is derivative works. You may re-use the image, but are you only allowed to re-use an unaltered copy, or are you also allowed to re-use a modified version? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I'm aware there's no restriction on the use of those photos from CMC - I know for a fact that Gráinne has no objection (I've asked her!) and the same image is available on her website. It's certainly been re-used for promotional purposes elsewhere - including a forthcoming commercial CD. The only stipulation is that the source is credited. As to altered versions, the head shot is itself a detail of a half-body shot, so even at source it's not unadulterated. I suspect that the situation is slightly unusual because the CMC is a non-profit organisation dedicated to the promotion of contemporary Irish composers rather than a publisher per se. As such, the wider the dissemination of their work the better. I could contact them and get definite confirmation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeofarrell (talk • contribs) 01:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:City Square Leeds.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:City Square Leeds.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:David Tepper.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Tepper.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:14, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DefiantTheatreGroupAtParkWest2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DefiantTheatreGroupAtParkWest2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:16, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Donald Charles Boulton Maclurcan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald Charles Boulton Maclurcan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:24, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EAST-ADL Abstraction leveles.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:EAST-ADL Abstraction leveles.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:27, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Frank and Nancy in Studio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank and Nancy in Studio.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Grand Hotel Comp Slip.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Hotel Comp Slip.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Grandslam Tv Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grandslam Tv Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Harper appointment to City Commission seat.pdf

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harper appointment to City Commission seat.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:36, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Histon Institute19131912.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Histon Institute19131912.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:39, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Historic building.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historic building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:41, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HMDS adhesion on silicon wafer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMDS adhesion on silicon wafer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Imm sound logo transparent.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imm sound logo transparent.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:48, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:International Organization for a Participatory Society interim logo.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:International Organization for a Participatory Society interim logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this file, Jason Chrysostomou, has allowed me to use it. What else information is needed? JohKar (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission needs to be sent to OTRS. See instructions at WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have asked the copyright-holder if he could send you the declaration of consent. JohKar (talk) 06:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jack (John F) Gordon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack (John F) Gordon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KarlPlagge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KarlPlagge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Logo for Global Network for Advanced Management.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo for Global Network for Advanced Management.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

OTRS >30 days old. OTRS queue checked for the file name and no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.