Jump to content

User talk:Floquenbeam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 58: Line 58:
:You jinxed it! --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam#top|talk]]) 15:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
:You jinxed it! --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam#top|talk]]) 15:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
::I do have a sinking feeling that a 14-game losing streak is getting started, but I’m going to blame… regression to the mean? :P '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
::I do have a sinking feeling that a 14-game losing streak is getting started, but I’m going to blame… regression to the mean? :P '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

== Something I already told Svartava re:RcAlex36 ==

Hello Floquenbeam,

Before you get too worried, this is NOT about my en.wikt block, but rather about the behavior of one of its users on my talkpage (that I sadly never noticed until July 5):

If you look at [[wikt:User:RcAlex36|RcAlex36]]'s messages [[wikt:User talk:Shāntián Tàiláng#Unblock_request_2021|here]], they sound like they're almost [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], especially when you consider he said my case was a case of {{linktext|死不足惜}} ("one's '''death''' is not or will not be a cause for regret", emphasis mine), even when I hadn't been edit-warring (disruptive editing, maybe, but ''not'' edit-warring; I had even thanked him for cleaning up after my bad edits prior to the block). In addition, I think that what he said ("I think you shouldn't be editing anything at all") may have...''driven'' me to do [https://web.archive.org/web/20211207173113/https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.82.45.69 these] and [https://web.archive.org/web/20211102110941/https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.82.47.169 these] block-evading edits. (Both of them involved creating Japanese names from redlinks, such as those listed [[wikt:ゆいな|here]]; at the time, I assumed that this permablock had mainly been done because of me ''continuing'' to make the bad edits—inaccurate Chinese entry creations—that RcAlex36 was unhappy about and for which I'd originally been blocked; I was not aware that "block evasion" applied to both good ''and'' bad edits.) Of course, RcAlex36's messages don't exactly ''excuse'' my later block evasions, but they still sound somewhat like taunting to me.<shrug>

Also, RcAlex36's edit summary [https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sh%C4%81nti%C3%A1n_T%C3%A0il%C3%A1ng&diff=64455151&oldid=64448352 here] and [https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASh%C4%81nti%C3%A1n_T%C3%A0il%C3%A1ng&type=revision&diff=64462699&oldid=64462591 his reply] to my message about that edit seem {{linktext|uncalled-for}}, since on Wiktionary you're not supposed to link to an Alternative Form of a word (like {{linktext|off-colour}} as opposed to {{linktext|off-color}}) unless you're talking about the edit history of, or links made to, the page of that Alternative Form itself.

Is what RcAlex36 did a crime? And if so, is there any way you can reprimand him for it? Thanks for your time. [[User:Shāntián Tàiláng|Shāntián Tàiláng]] ([[User talk:Shāntián Tàiláng|talk]]) 16:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:53, 25 July 2022

MEH

Folly, thou conquerest, and I must yield!
Against stupidity the very gods
Themselves contend in vain. --Friedrich Schiller

You know...

I'm not so sure they haven't been trolling this entire time. Who knows? PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't know. But I do have an opinion. Which is becoming stronger as time goes on. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Surprise surprise. Looks like I missed all the excitement. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the year

Fourteen in a row... Ty France hitting north of .300, J-Rod tearing it up, Winkler winning fights with the whole Angels dugout, Logan Gilbert over 100 innings before the All-Star break... MastCell Talk 15:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You jinxed it! --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do have a sinking feeling that a 14-game losing streak is getting started, but I’m going to blame… regression to the mean? :P MastCell Talk 21:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Something I already told Svartava re:RcAlex36

Hello Floquenbeam,

Before you get too worried, this is NOT about my en.wikt block, but rather about the behavior of one of its users on my talkpage (that I sadly never noticed until July 5):

If you look at RcAlex36's messages here, they sound like they're almost personal attacks, especially when you consider he said my case was a case of 死不足惜 ("one's death is not or will not be a cause for regret", emphasis mine), even when I hadn't been edit-warring (disruptive editing, maybe, but not edit-warring; I had even thanked him for cleaning up after my bad edits prior to the block). In addition, I think that what he said ("I think you shouldn't be editing anything at all") may have...driven me to do these and these block-evading edits. (Both of them involved creating Japanese names from redlinks, such as those listed here; at the time, I assumed that this permablock had mainly been done because of me continuing to make the bad edits—inaccurate Chinese entry creations—that RcAlex36 was unhappy about and for which I'd originally been blocked; I was not aware that "block evasion" applied to both good and bad edits.) Of course, RcAlex36's messages don't exactly excuse my later block evasions, but they still sound somewhat like taunting to me.<shrug>

Also, RcAlex36's edit summary here and his reply to my message about that edit seem uncalled-for, since on Wiktionary you're not supposed to link to an Alternative Form of a word (like off-colour as opposed to off-color) unless you're talking about the edit history of, or links made to, the page of that Alternative Form itself.

Is what RcAlex36 did a crime? And if so, is there any way you can reprimand him for it? Thanks for your time. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 16:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]