Jump to content

Talk:Jabalpur–Indore Overnight Express: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Merger proposal: Closing discussion
Added merger attribution notice
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP India|class=|importance=}}
{{WP India|class=|importance=}}
{{TrainsWikiProject|class=|importance=}}
{{TrainsWikiProject|class=|importance=}}
{{Copied|from=Jabalpur - Bhopal Express|to=Jabalpur - Indore Express|diff=https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Jabalpur_-_Indore_Express&action=historysubmit&diff=423699449&oldid=420333115}}


== Merger proposal ==
== Merger proposal ==

Revision as of 15:41, 12 April 2011

WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTrains Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge. SBC-YPR (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that the Jabalpur - Bhopal Express article be merged into this one. Since that train was merely a historical version of the one in this article, I think it can easily be explained as a section here, as there are no significant historical details to merit a whole independent article. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 15:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable to me. bobrayner (talk) 17:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.