Jump to content

Paganism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Sowlos (talk | contribs)
3,511 edits
→‎Definition: Reverted a rewording a quoted text. *For reasons that should be obvious, you cannot modify a quoted exert to a wording you find more agreeable.*
Sowlos (talk | contribs)
3,511 edits
→‎Definition: Perhaps this a better way to link to the referred concept
Line 45: Line 45:
==Definition==
==Definition==
{{quote|It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as “paganism” at the beginning of [the Common Era] ... It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others.|North 1992, 187—88|{{sfn|Cameron|2011|pp=26—27}}}}
{{quote|It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as “paganism” at the beginning of [the Common Era] ... It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others.|North 1992, 187—88|{{sfn|Cameron|2011|pp=26—27}}}}
Defining paganism is problematic. Understanding the context of its associated terminology is important.{{sfn|Davies|2011|loc=Defining paganism}} [[Early Christian]]s referred to the diverse array of [[cultus|cults]] around them as a single group for convenience and [[rhetoric]].{{sfn|Cameron|2011|p=26}} While ''paganism'' generally implies [[polytheism]], the primary distinction between classical pagans and Christians was not one of [[monotheism]] versus polytheism. Not all pagans were strictly polytheist. Throughout history, many of them believed in a [[Deity|Supreme deity]]. (Although, most such pagans believed in a class of subordinate gods/[[daimon]]s—see [[henotheism]]—or divine [[emanation]]s.){{sfn|Cameron|2011|pp=28, 30}} To Christians, the most important distinction was whether or not someone worshipped the ''[[one true God]]''. Those who did not (polytheist, monotheist, [[atheist]], or otherwise) were outsiders to the [[Christian Church|Church]] and thus ''pagan''.{{sfn|Cameron|2011|pp=27, 31}} Similarly, classical pagans would have found it peculiar to distinguish groups by the number of [[deities]] followers venerate. They would have considered the priestly colleges (such as the [[College of Pontiffs]] or [[Epulones]]) and cult practices more meaningful distinctions.{{sfn|Cameron|2011|p=29}}
Defining paganism is problematic. Understanding the context of its associated terminology is important.{{sfn|Davies|2011|loc=Defining paganism}} [[Early Christian]]s referred to the diverse array of [[cultus|cults]] around them as a single group for convenience and [[rhetoric]].{{sfn|Cameron|2011|p=26}} While ''paganism'' generally implies [[polytheism]], the primary distinction between classical pagans and Christians was not one of [[monotheism]] versus polytheism. Not all pagans were strictly polytheist. Throughout history, many of them believed in a [[Supreme Being|supreme]] [[deity]]. (Although, most such pagans believed in a class of subordinate gods/[[daimon]]s—see [[henotheism]]—or divine [[emanation]]s.){{sfn|Cameron|2011|pp=28, 30}} To Christians, the most important distinction was whether or not someone worshipped the ''[[one true God]]''. Those who did not (polytheist, monotheist, [[atheist]], or otherwise) were outsiders to the [[Christian Church|Church]] and thus ''pagan''.{{sfn|Cameron|2011|pp=27, 31}} Similarly, classical pagans would have found it peculiar to distinguish groups by the number of [[deities]] followers venerate. They would have considered the priestly colleges (such as the [[College of Pontiffs]] or [[Epulones]]) and cult practices more meaningful distinctions.{{sfn|Cameron|2011|p=29}}


Referring to paganism as "pre-Christian indigenous religions" is equally untenable. Not all historical pagan traditions were pre-Christian or indigenous to their places of worship.{{sfn|Davies|2011|loc=Defining paganism}}
Referring to paganism as "pre-Christian indigenous religions" is equally untenable. Not all historical pagan traditions were pre-Christian or indigenous to their places of worship.{{sfn|Davies|2011|loc=Defining paganism}}

Revision as of 20:13, 13 February 2014

Not to be confused with Pagani.
"Pagan" redirects here. For other uses, see Pagan (disambiguation).
The Venus of Arles, depicting the goddess Venus holding the apple of Hesperides.

Paganism is a broad group of indigenous and historical polytheistic religious traditions—primarily those of cultures known to the classical world. In a wider sense, it has also been understood to include any non-Abrahamic, folk, ethnic religion. However, modern ethnologists often avoid referring to non-classical and non-European, traditional and historical faiths thus broadly in favour of less ambiguous concepts (e.g. polytheism, shamanism, pantheism, or animism).

Contemporary or modern paganism (also known as neopaganism) is a group of new religious movements influenced by or claiming to be derived from the various historical pagan beliefs of pre-modern Europe.[1][2] Contemporary Pagan religious movements are diverse, sharing no single set of beliefs, deities, creed, ritual practices, or texts; nor do any expounded themselves as absolutely authoritative. However, there is a great deal of overlap amongst Pagan movements; and there are a number of beliefs commonly shared by many Pagans. These include a general belief of divinity found in mind and nature, pluralism, pantheism, and polytheism.[3]

Nomenclature and etymology

Reconstruction of the Parthenon, on the Acropolis of Athens, Greece.

Hellene

Template:Details3 In the Latin-speaking West of the newly Christianizing Roman Empire, Greek became associated with the traditional polytheistic beliefs of Ancient Greece and regarded as a foreign language (lingua peregrina).[4] By the latter half of the 4th century in the Greek-speaking East, Pagans were—paradoxically—most commonly called Hellenes ([Ἕλλην] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help), lit. "Greeks"). The word almost entirely ceased being used in a cultural sense.[5][6] It retained that meaning for roughly the first millennium of Christianity.

This was influenced by Christianity's early membership, who were Jewish. Jews of the time distinguished themselves from foreigners according to religious rather than ethnocultural standards and early Jewish Christians would have done the same. As Hellenic culture was the dominant pagan culture in the Roman east, they called pagans Greek (Hellene). Christianity inherited Jewish terminology for non-Jews and adapted it to refer to non-Christians they were in contact with. This usage is recorded in the New Testament. In the Pauline epistles, Hellene almost always juxtaposed to Hebrew in disregard of actual ethnicities.[6]

Usage of Hellene as a religious term was initially part of an exclusively Christians nomenclature, but some pagans began defiantly calling themselves Hellenes. Other pagans even preferred the narrowed meaning of the word—from a broad cultural sphere to a more specific religious grouping. However, there were many Christians and pagans alike who strongly objected to the evolution of the terminology. The influential Archbishop of Constantinople Gregory of Nazianzus, for example, took offence to imperial efforts to suppress Hellenic culture (especially concerning spoken and written Greek) and openly criticized the emperor.[5]

The growing religious stigmatization of Hellenism had a chilling effect on Hellenic culture by the late 4th century.[5]

By late antiquity, however, it was possible to speak Greek as a primary language while not conceiving of oneself a "Hellene".[7] The long-established use of Greek in and around the eastern Roman Empire a lingua franca ironically allowed it to instead become central in enabling the spread of Christianity—as indicated for example by the use of Greek for the Epistles of Paul.[8] In the first half of the 5th century, Greek was the standard language in which bishops communicated,[9] and the Acta Conciliorum ("Acts of the Church Councils") were recorded originally in Greek and then translated into other languages.[10]

Pagan

The adoption of paganus by Latin Christians as an all-embracing, pejorative term for polytheists represents an unforeseen and singularly long-lasting victory, within a religious group, of a word of Latin slang originally devoid of religious meaning. The evolution occurred only in the Latin west, and in connection with the Latin church. Elsewhere, "Hellene" or "gentile" (ethnikos) remained the word for "pagan"; and paganos continued as a purely secular term, with overtones of the inferior and the commonplace.

— Peter Brown, Late Antiquity, 1999[11]

The term pagan is from Late Latin paganus, revived during the Renaissance. Itself deriving from classical Latin pagus which originally meant "region delimited by markers", paganus had also come to mean "of or relating to the countryside", "country dweller", "villager"; by extension, "rustic", "unlearned", "yokel", "bumpkin"; in Roman military jargon, "non-combantant", "civilian", "unskilled soldier". It is related to pangere ("to fix", "to fasten") and ultimately comes from Proto-Indo-European *pag- ("to fix").[12]

Medieval writers often assumed paganus as a religious term was a result of the conversion patterns during the Christianization of Europe, where people in towns and cities were converted more readily than those in remote regions, where old ways lingered. However, this idea has multiple problems. First, the word's usage as a reference to non-Christians pre-dates that period in history. Second, paganism within the Roman Empire centred on cities. The concept of an urban Christianity as opposed to a rural paganism would not have occurred to Romans during Early Christianity. Third, unlike words such as rusticitas, paganus had not yet fully acquired the meanings (of uncultured backwardness) used to explain why it would have been applied to pagans.[13]

Paganus more likely acquired its meaning in Christian nomenclature via Roman military jargon (see above). Early Christians adopted military motifs and saw themselves as "Milites Christi" ("soldiers of Christ").[12][13] A good example of Christians still using paganus in a military context rather than religious is in Tertullian's De Corona Militis XI.V, where Christians are referred to as "paganus" (civilian):[13]

Apud hunc [Christum] tam miles est paganus fidelis quam paganus est miles fidelis.[14] With Him [Christ] the faithful citizen is a soldier, just as the faithful soldier is a citizen.[15]

Paganus acquires its religious connotations by the mid-4th century.[13] As early as the 5th century, paganos was metaphorically used to denote persons outside the bounds of the Christian community. Following the sack of Rome to pagan Visigoths just over fifteen years after the Christian persecution of paganism under Theodosius I,[16] murmurs began to spread that the old gods had taken greater care of the city than the Christian God. In response, Augustine of Hippo wrote De Civitate Dei contra Paganos ("The City of God against the Pagans"). In it, he contrasted the fallen "city of Man" to the "city of God" of which all Christians were ultimately citizens. Hence, the foreign invaders were "not of the city" or "rural".[17][18][19]

The term Pagan is not attested in the English language until the 17th century.[20] It was traditionally used as one of several pejorative Christian counterparts to "gentile" ([[[goy|גוי]]] Error: {{Lang}}: missing language tag (help) / נכרי) as used in the Hebrew Bible—comparable to "infidel" or "heretic".[citation needed]

Heathen

"Heathen" redirects here. For other uses, see Heathen (disambiguation).

Heathen comes from Old English [[[wikt:hæðen|hæðen]]] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help) ("not Christian or Jewish"); cf. Old Norse [[[wikt:heiðinn|heiðinn]]] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help). This meaning for the term originated from Gothic [[[wikt:haiþno|haiþno]]] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help) ("gentile woman") being used to translate "Hellene" (cf. Mark 7:26) in Wulfila's Bible, the first translation of the Bible into a Germanic language. This may have been influenced by the Greek and Latin terminology of the time used for pagans. If so, it may be derived from Gothic [[[wikt:haiþi|haiþi]]] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help) ("dwelling on the heath"). However, this is not attested. It may even be a borrowing of Greek ἔθνος (ethnos) via Armenian [[[wikt:hethanos|hethanos]]] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help).[21]

Definition

It is perhaps misleading even to say that there was such a religion as “paganism” at the beginning of [the Common Era] ... It might be less confusing to say that the pagans, before their competition with Christianity, had no religion at all in the sense in which that word is normally used today. They had no tradition of discourse about ritual or religious matters (apart from philosophical debate or antiquarian treatise), no organized system of beliefs to which they were asked to commit themselves, no authority-structure peculiar to the religious area, above all no commitment to a particular group of people or set of ideas other than their family and political context. If this is the right view of pagan life, it follows that we should look on paganism quite simply as a religion invented in the course of the second to third centuries AD, in competition and interaction with Christians, Jews and others.

— North 1992, 187—88, [22]

Defining paganism is problematic. Understanding the context of its associated terminology is important.[23] Early Christians referred to the diverse array of cults around them as a single group for convenience and rhetoric.[24] While paganism generally implies polytheism, the primary distinction between classical pagans and Christians was not one of monotheism versus polytheism. Not all pagans were strictly polytheist. Throughout history, many of them believed in a supreme deity. (Although, most such pagans believed in a class of subordinate gods/daimons—see henotheism—or divine emanations.)[25] To Christians, the most important distinction was whether or not someone worshipped the one true God. Those who did not (polytheist, monotheist, atheist, or otherwise) were outsiders to the Church and thus pagan.[26] Similarly, classical pagans would have found it peculiar to distinguish groups by the number of deities followers venerate. They would have considered the priestly colleges (such as the College of Pontiffs or Epulones) and cult practices more meaningful distinctions.[27]

Referring to paganism as "pre-Christian indigenous religions" is equally untenable. Not all historical pagan traditions were pre-Christian or indigenous to their places of worship.[23]

Owing to the history of its nomenclature, paganism traditionally encompass the collective pre- and non-Christian cultures in and around the classical world; including those of the Greco-Roman, Celtic, Germanic, Slavic tribes.[28] However, modern parlance of folklorists and contemporary Pagans in particular has extended the original four millennia scope used by early Christians to include similar religious traditions stretching far into prehistory.[29]

Perception

Paganism came to be equated by Christians with a sense of Epicureanism, representing those who are sensual, materialistic, self-indulgent, unconcerned with the future, and uninterested in sophisticated religion. Pagans were usually described within this worldly stereotype, especially among those drawing attention to what they perceived as the limitations of Paganism. Thus G. K. Chesterton wrote: "The Pagan set out, with admirable sense, to enjoy himself. By the end of his civilization he had discovered that a man cannot enjoy himself and continue to enjoy anything else." In sharp contrast, Swinburne the poet would comment on this same theme: "Thou hast conquered, O pale Galilean; the world has grown grey from thy breath; We have drunken of things Lethean, and fed on the fullness of death."[30]

Christian perception and usage of pagan is similar to Muslim kafir ([كافر] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help), "unbeliever", "infidel") and mushrik ([مشرك] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help)).[31]

History

Bronze Age to Early Iron Age

Some megaliths are believed to have religious significance.

Classical antiquity

Main articles: Religion in ancient Greece, Ancient Roman religion, Hellenistic religion, and Roman imperial cult

Ludwig Feuerbach (1833) defined "Paganism" of classical antiquity, which he termed Heidentum, literally "heathenry" as "the unity of religion and politics, of spirit and nature, of god and man",[32] qualified by the observation that "man" in the Pagan view is always defined by ethnicity, i.e. Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Jew, etc., so that each Pagan tradition is also a national tradition. Modern historians define paganism instead as the aggregate of cult acts, set within a civic rather than a "national" context, without a written creed or sense of orthodoxy.[33]

Feuerbach went on to postulate that the emergence of monotheism and thus the end of the Pagan period was a development which naturally grew out of Hellenistic philosophy due to the contradiction inherent in the ethnic nature of Pagan tradition and the universality of human spirituality (Geist), finally resulting in the emergence of a religion with a universalist scope in the form of Christianity,[34]

No modern historian would see the emergence of Christianity as a culmination of a trend towards an exclusive monotheism: favoured deities addressed as "the One" did not preclude their followers, even their priests, from worshiping other gods as well.[35]

Late Antiquity

Further information: Decline of Hellenistic paganism and Hellenic philosophy and Christianity
Hypatia, a Neoplatonist philosopher, mathematician, and astronomer— killed by a Christian mob, in March 415 CE, after becoming embroiled in a religious feud in Alexandria.

The developments of Late Antiquity in the religious thought in the far-flung Roman Empire needs to be addressed separately, as this is the context in which Early Christianity itself developed as one of several monotheistic cults, and it was in this period that the concept of "pagan" developed in the first place. Christianity as it emerged from Second Temple Judaism (or Hellenistic Judaism) stood in competition with other religions advocating "pagan monotheism", including Neoplatonism, Mithraism, Gnosticism, Manichaeanism, and the cult of Dionysus.[36]

Dionysus in particular exhibits significant parallels with Christ, so that numerous scholars have concluded that the recasting of Jesus the wandering rabbi into the image of Christ the Logos, the divine saviour, reflects the cult of Dionysus directly. They point to the symbolism of wine and the importance it held in the mythology surrounding both Dionysus and Jesus Christ;[37][38] Wick argues that the use of wine symbolism in the Gospel of John, including the story of the Marriage at Cana at which Jesus turns water into wine, was intended to show Jesus as superior to Dionysus.[39] The scene in The Bacchae wherein Dionysus appears before King Pentheus on charges of claiming divinity is compared to the New Testament scene of Jesus being interrogated by Pontius Pilate.[39][40][41]

Early Modern period

Interest in pagan traditions was revived in the Renaissance, at first in Renaissance magic as a revival of Greco-Roman magic. In the 17th century, description of paganism turned from the theological aspect to the ethnological, and a religion began to be understood as part of the ethnic identity of a people, and the study of the religions of "primitive" peoples triggered questions as to the ultimate historical origin of religion. Thus, Nicolas Fabri de Peiresc saw the pagan religions of Africa of his day as relicts that were in principle capable of shedding light on the historical Paganism of Classical Antiquity.[42]

Romanticism

Paganism re-surfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.

File:Illustration for the Brothers Grimm fairy tale Rapunzel..jpg
Rapunzel - an illustration from the Brothers Grimm adaptation

The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[43]

Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloristic topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.

Survivals in folklore

Further information: Folklore

In addition, folklore that is not any longer perceived as holding any religious significance can in some instances be traced to pre-Christian or pre-Islamic origins. In Europe, this is particularly the case with the various customs of Carnival like the carnival in the Netherlands or Fasnacht and the Yule traditions surrounding Santa Claus/Sinterklaas. By contrast, the Christmas tree in spite of frequent association with Thor's Oak cannot be shown to be an innovation predating the Early Modern period.

Contemporary Paganism

Main article: Modern paganism
Children standing with The Lady of Cornwall in a pagan ceremony in England
Pagan handfasting ceremony at Avebury (Beltane 2005).

Contemporary Paganism, or Neopaganism, includes reconstructed religions such as the Cultus Deorum Romanorum, Hellenic polytheism, Slavic neopaganism (Rodnovery), Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism, or Germanic religious reconstructionism, as well as modern eclectic traditions such as Discordianism, Wicca and its many offshoots.

Many of the "revivals", Wicca and Neo-druidism in particular, have their roots in 19th century Romanticism and retain noticeable elements of occultism or theosophy that were current then, setting them apart from historical rural (paganus) folk religion. Most Pagans, however, believe in the divine character of the natural world and Paganism is often described as an "Earth religion".[44]

The hammer Mjöllnir is one of the primary symbols of Germanic Neopaganism.

In Iceland, the members of Ásatrúarfélagið account for 0.4% of the total population,[45] which is just over a thousand people. In Lithuania, many people practice Romuva, a revived version of the pre-Christian religion of that country. Lithuania was among the last areas of Europe to be Christianized. In originally Anglo-Saxon nations such as Australia, Odinism has been established on a formal basis since at least the 1930s.

There are a number of Pagan authors who have examined the relation of the 20th-century movements of polytheistic revival with historical polytheism on one hand and contemporary traditions of indigenous folk religion on the other. Isaac Bonewits introduces a terminology to make this distinction,[46]

Prudence Jones and Nigel Pennick in their A History of Pagan Europe (1995) classify "pagan religions" as characterized by the following traits:

  • polytheism: Pagan religions recognise a plurality of divine beings, which may or may not be considered aspects of an underlying unity (the soft and hard polytheism distinction)
  • "nature-based": Pagan religions have a concept of the divinity of Nature, which they view as a manifestation of the divine, not as the "fallen" creation found in Dualistic cosmology.
  • "sacred feminine": Pagan religions recognize "the female divine principle", identified as "the Goddess" (as opposed to individual goddesses) besides or in place of the male divine principle as expressed in the Abrahamic God.[47]

In modern times, "Heathen" and "Heathenry" are increasingly used to refer to those branches of Paganism inspired by the pre-Christian religions of the Germanic, Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon peoples.[48]

Christianity as pagan

Christianity itself has been perceived at times as a form of polytheism by followers of the other Abrahamic religions[49] because of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity (which at first glance might suggest Tritheism,[50]) or the celebration of Pagan feast days[51] and other practices – through a process described as "baptizing"[52] or "Christianization". Even between Christians there have been similar charges of idolatry levelled, especially by Protestants,[53][54] towards the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches for their veneration of the saints and images. Some scholars think that the essential doctrines of Christianity have been influenced by pre-Christianity, paganism, or European occults.[55]

Ethnic religions of pre-Christian Europe

Further information: Christianization
Cuman statue, 11th century, Ukraine
2

See also

Look up pagan or heathen in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikiquote has quotations related to Paganism.

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ Lewis, James R. (2004). The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements. Oxford University Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-19-514986-6.
  2. ^ Hanegraff, Wouter J. (1006). New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought. Brill Academic Publishers. p. 84. ISBN 90-04-10696-0.
  3. ^ Dennis D. Carpenter. "Emergent Nature Spirituality: An Examination of the Major Spiritual Contours of the Contemporary Pagan Worldview". In James R. Lewis (ed.). Magical Religion and Modern Witchcraft. State University of New York Press. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-7914-2890-0.
  4. ^ Augustine, Confessions 1.14.23; Moatii, "Translation, Migration, and Communication," p. 112.
  5. ^ a b c Cameron, Alan G.; Long, Jacqueline; Sherry, Lee (1993). "2: Synesius of Cyrene; VI: The Dion". Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. University of California Press. pp. 66–67. ISBN 9780520065505.
  6. ^ a b Cameron 2011, pp. 16–17.
  7. ^ Simon Swain, "Defending Hellenism: Philostratus, in Honour of Apollonius," in Apologetics, p. 173.
  8. ^ Treadgold, A History of the Byzantine State, p. 5.
  9. ^ Millar, A Greek Roman Empire, pp. 97–98.
  10. ^ Millar, A Greek Roman Empire, p. 98.
  11. ^ Peter Brown, in Glen Warren Bowersock, Peter Robert Lamont Brown, Oleg Grabar, eds., Late Antiquity: a guide to the postclassical world, 1999, s.v. "Pagan".
  12. ^ a b Harper, Douglas. "pagan (n.)". The Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 18 July 2013.
  13. ^ a b c d Cameron 2011, pp. 14–15.
  14. ^ De Corona Militis XI.V
  15. ^ Ante-Nicene Fathers III, De Corona XI
  16. ^ "Theodosius I", The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1912
  17. ^ "The City of God". Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite DVD, 2003.
  18. ^ Orosius Histories 1. Prol. "ui alieni a civitate dei..pagani vocantur."
  19. ^ C. Mohrmann, Vigiliae Christianae 6 (1952) 9ff; Oxford English Dictionary, (online) 2nd Edition (1989)
  20. ^ The OED instances Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776): "The divisions of Christianity suspended the ruin of Paganism."
  21. ^ Harper, Douglas. "heathen (n.)". The Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 18 July 2013.
  22. ^ Cameron 2011, pp. 26–27.
  23. ^ a b Davies 2011, Defining paganism.
  24. ^ Cameron 2011, p. 26.
  25. ^ Cameron 2011, pp. 28, 30.
  26. ^ Cameron 2011, pp. 27, 31.
  27. ^ Cameron 2011, p. 29.
  28. ^ Cameron 2011, p. 28.
  29. ^ Davies 2011, Chapter 1: The ancient world.
  30. ^ 'Hymn to Proserpine'
  31. ^ Eisenstadt, S.N., 1983, Transcendental Visions – Other-Worldliness – and Its Transformations: Some More Comments on L. Dumont. Religion13:1–17, at p. 3.
  32. ^ cf. the civil, natural and mythical theologies of Marcus Terentius Varro
  33. ^ A summary of the modern view is given in Robin Lane Fox, Pagans and Christians 1989:31ff: "The modern emphasis on paganism's cult acts was also acknowledged by pagains themselves. It shaped the way they tried and tested Christians.".
  34. ^ Ludwig Feuerbach, Geschichte der neueren Philosophie (1833), Introduction, §1 (Paganism, Philosophy, Religion, Christianity) Das Wesen des Heidentums war die Einheit von Religion und Politik, Geist und Natur, Gott und Mensch. Aber der Mensch im Heidentum war nicht der Mensch schlechtweg, sondern der nationell bestimmte Mensch: der Grieche, der Römer, der Ägyptier, der Jude, folglich auch sein Gott ein nationell bestimmtes, besonderes, dem Wesen oder Gotte anderer Völker entgegengesetztes Wesen — ein Wesen also im Widerspruch mit dem Geiste, welcher das Wesen der Menschheit und als ihr Wesen die allgemeine Einheit aller Völker und Menschen ist. Die Aufhebung dieses Widerspruchs im Heidentum war die heidnische Philosophie; denn sie riß den Menschen heraus aus seiner nationellen Abgeschlossenheit und Selbstgenügsamkeit, erhob ihn über die Borniertheit des Volksdünkels und Volksglaubens, versetzte ihn auf den kosmopolitischen Standpunkt.
  35. ^ Fox 1989:35.
  36. ^ E. Kessler, Dionysian Monotheism in Nea Paphos, Cyprus "two monotheistic religions, Dionysian and Christian, existed contemporaneously in Nea Paphos during the 4th century C.E. [...] the particular iconography of Hermes and Dionysos in the panel of the Epiphany of Dionysos [...] represents the culmination of a Pagan iconographic tradition in which an infant divinity is seated on the lap of another divine figure; this Pagan motif was appropriated by early Christian artists and developed into the standardized icon of the Virgin and Child. Thus the mosaic helps to substantiate the existence of Pagan monotheism." Biblical Studies on the Web
  37. ^ Pausanias, Description of Greece 6. 26. 1 - 2
  38. ^ Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae 2. 34a
  39. ^ a b Wick, Peter (2004). "Jesus gegen Dionysos? Ein Beitrag zur Kontextualisierung des Johannesevangeliums". Biblica. 85 (2). Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute: 179–198. Retrieved 10 October 2007. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  40. ^ Studies in Early Christology, by Martin Hengel, 2005, p.331 (ISBN 0567042804)
  41. ^ Powell, Barry B., Classical Myth Second ed. With new translations of ancient texts by Herbert M. Howe. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998.
  42. ^ "It would be a great pleasure to make the comparison with what survives to us of ancient Paganism in our old books, in order to have better [grasped] their spirit." Peter N. Miller, History of Religion Becomes Ethnology: Some Evidence from Peiresc's Africa Journal of the History of Ideas 67.4 (2006) 675–696.[1]
  43. ^ Jack Zipes, The Great Fairy Tale Tradition: From Straparola and Basile to the Brothers Grimm, p 846, ISBN 0-393-97636-X
  44. ^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/0/20693321
  45. ^ Statistics Iceland – Statistics >> Population >> Religious organisations
  46. ^ "Defining Paganism: Paleo-, Meso-, and Neo-" (Version 2.5.1) 1979, 2007 c.e., Isaac Bonewits
  47. ^ Jones, Prudence; Pennick, Nigel (1995). A History of Pagan Europe. Page 2. Routledge.
  48. ^ [2]
  49. ^ Jewish Encyclopedia
  50. ^ Chapman, John (1912). "Tritheists", The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 15. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 17 May 2011.
  51. ^ Christianised calendar
  52. ^ The Pope, The Emperor and the Persian Leader
  53. ^ 'Philip Melanchthon 'Apologia Confessionis Augustanae'
  54. ^ Jean Seznec 'The Survival of the Pagan Gods'
  55. ^ "Paganism in Our Christianity", by Arthur Weigall

Bibliography

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paganism&oldid=595347334"