Jump to content

Northwest Ordinance: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverting possible vandalism by 75.170.80.2 to version by Look2See1. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (158305) (Bot)
Line 39: Line 39:


===Prohibition of slavery===
===Prohibition of slavery===
"There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory".<ref>http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp</ref> The language of the ordinance seems to ban slavery, but it continued almost until the Civil War.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/pss/3123523| ''Evading the Ordinance: The Persistence of Bondage in Indiana and Illinois''|Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 9, No. 1 (Spring, 1989)|, pp. 21]</ref> Southern states voted for the law apparently because they did not want to compete over tobacco. The balance of slave states would not be affected with slavery south of the Ohio River in 1790.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=XbzhWvjCxc0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Student%27s+guide+to+landmark+congressional+laws+on+civil+rights&hl=en&ei=Nj72TO2JAoSuuQOY6-24Cw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=ordinance&f=false| ''Student's guide to landmark congressional laws on civil rights''|Paul Finkelman| Marcus D. Pohlmann, Linda Vallar Whisenhunt| Greenwood Press, 2002|, pp. 14-15]</ref> Article VI required fugitive slaves to be returned, giving slave owners unprecedented support not previously available.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/pss/3122644| ''Slavery and the Northwest Ordinance: A Study in Ambiguity''| Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter, 1986)|, pp. 345]</ref>
"There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory".<ref>http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp</ref> The language of the ordinance seems to ban slavery, but it continued almost until the Civil War.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/pss/3123523| ''Evading the Ordinance: The Persistence of Bondage in Indiana and Illinois''|Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 9, No. 1 (Spring, 1989)|, pp. 21]</ref> Southern states voted for the law apparently because they did not want to compete over tobacco. The balance of slave states would not be affected with slavery south of the Ohio River in 1790.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=XbzhWvjCxc0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Student%27s+guide+to+landmark+congressional+laws+on+civil+rights&hl=en&ei=Nj72TO2JAoSuuQOY6-24Cw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=ordinance&f=false| ''Student's guide to landmark congressional laws on civil rights''|Paul Finkelman| Marcus D. Pohlmann, Linda Vallar Whisenhunt| Greenwood Press, 2002|, pp. 14-15]</ref>

"Virginia, it is well known, in the year 1784, ceded to the United States then united only by the original Articles of Confederation her vast possessions northwest of the Ohio, from which the great States of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota, have since been formed. In 1787 before the adoption of the Federal Constitution the celebrated "Ordinance" for the government of this Northwestern Territory was adopted by the Congress, with the full consent, and indeed at the express instance, of Virginia. This Ordinance included six definite "Articles of compact between the original States and the people and States in the said Territory," which were to "for ever remain unalterable unless by common consent." The sixth of these articles ordains that "there shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said Territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."<ref>Davis, Jefferson. [[http://www.archive.org/stream/risefallofconfed01daviuoft/risefallofconfed01daviuoft_djvu.txt "The Rise and Fall of the confederate Government.]] Volume I, page 7.</ref>

Article VI required fugitive slaves to be returned, giving slave owners unprecedented support not previously available.<ref>[http://www.jstor.org/pss/3122644| ''Slavery and the Northwest Ordinance: A Study in Ambiguity''| Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter, 1986)|, pp. 345]</ref>


===Definition of the Midwest as a region===
===Definition of the Midwest as a region===

Revision as of 21:33, 4 January 2011

Northwest Territory (1787)

The Northwest Ordinance (formally An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States, North-West of the River Ohio, and also known as the Freedom Ordinance or "The Ordinance of 1787") was an act of the Congress of the Confederation of the United States. The primary effect of the ordinance was the creation of the Northwest Territory as the first organized territory of the United States out of the region south of the Great Lakes, north and west of the Ohio River, and east of the Mississippi River. On August 7, 1789, the U.S. Congress affirmed the Ordinance with slight modifications under the Constitution.

Arguably the single most important piece of legislation passed by members of the earlier Continental Congresses other than the Declaration of Independence, it established the precedent by which the United States would expand westward across North America by the admission of new states, rather than by the expansion of existing states.

Further, the prohibition of slavery in the territory had the effect of establishing the Ohio River as the boundary between free and slave territory in the region between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. This division helped set the stage for the balancing act between free and slave states that was the basis of a critical political question in American politics in the 19th century until the Civil War.

History

The territories northwest and southwest of the Ohio River are depicted on this map of the early United States (1783-1803).

Acquired by Great Britain from France following the 1763 Treaty of Paris, the Ohio Country had been closed to white settlement by the Proclamation of 1763. The United States claimed the region after the 1783 Treaty of Paris that ended the American Revolutionary War, but was subject to overlapping and conflicting claims of the states of Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, and Virginia, as well as a lingering British presence that was not settled until the War of 1812.

The region had long been desired for expansion by colonists, however, and urgency of the settlement of the claims of the states was prompted in large measure by the de facto opening of the area to settlement following the loss of British control.

In 1784, Thomas Jefferson proposed that the states should relinquish their particular claims to all the territory west of the Appalachians, and the area should be divided into new states of the Union. Thomas Jefferson's proposal of creating a national domain through state cessions of western lands came from earlier proposals dating back to 1776 debates about the Articles of Confederation.[1] Jefferson proposed creating seventeen roughly rectangular states from the territory, and even suggested names for the new states, including Chersonesus, Sylvania, Assenisipia, Metropotamia, Polypotamia, Pelisipia, Saratoga, Washington, Michigania and Illinoia. The proposal was adopted in a modified form, and without Jefferson's invented names, as the Land Ordinance of 1784. This ordinance established the example that would become the basis for the Northwest Ordinance three years later. Michigan, Illinois, and Washington would eventually be used as state names.

The 1784 ordinance was criticized by George Washington in 1785 and James Monroe in 1786. Monroe convinced Congress to reconsider the proposed state boundaries and a committee was formed which recommended repealing that part of the ordinance. Other politicians questioned the 1784 ordinance's plan for organizing governments in new states, and worried that the new states' relatively small size would undermine the original states' power in Congress. Other events such as the reluctance of states south of the Ohio River to cede their western claims resulted in a narrowed geographic focus.[1]

Effects of the legislation

Plaque commemorating the Northwest Ordinance outside Federal Hall in lower Manhattan (site of the U.S. Capital in 1787)

Abolition of state claims

The passage of the ordinance followed the relinquishing of all such claims by the states over the territory, which was to be administered directly by Congress, with the intent of eventual admission of newly created states from the territory. The legislation was revolutionary in that it established the precedent for lands to be administered by the central government, albeit temporarily, rather than underneath the jurisdiction of particular states.

Admission of new states

The most significant intended purpose of this legislation was its mandate for the creation of new states from the region, once a population of 60,000 had been achieved within a particular territory. The actual legal mechanism of the admission of new states was established in the Enabling Act of 1802. The first state created from the Northwest Territory was Ohio, in 1803, at which time the remainder was renamed Indiana Territory. The other four states were Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin. A significant portion (about 1/3) of Minnesota was also part of the territory.

Establishment of territorial government

As an organic act, the ordinance created a civil government in the territory under the direct jurisdiction of the Congress. The ordinance was thus the prototype for the subsequent organic acts that created organized territories during the westward expansion of the United States. It specifically provided for the appointment by Congress of a Territorial Governor with a three-year term, a Territorial Secretary with a four-year term, and three Judges, with no set limit to their term. As soon as there was a population of 5,000 "free male inhabitants of full age", they could form a general assembly for a legislature. In 1789, the U.S. Congress made minor changes, such that the President, with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, had the power to appoint and remove the Governor and officers of the territory instead of Congress. The Territorial Secretary was authorized to act for the Governor, if he died, was absent, was removed, or resigned from office.

Establishment of civil rights

The civil rights provisions of the ordinance foreshadowed the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution.[2] Many of the concepts and guarantees of the Ordinance of 1787 were incorporated in the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In the Northwest Territory, various legal and property rights were enshrined, religious tolerance was proclaimed, and it was enunciated that since "Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged." The right of habeas corpus was written into the charter, as was freedom of religious worship and bans on excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment. Trial by jury and a ban on ex post facto laws were also rights granted.

Prohibition of slavery

"There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory".[3] The language of the ordinance seems to ban slavery, but it continued almost until the Civil War.[4] Southern states voted for the law apparently because they did not want to compete over tobacco. The balance of slave states would not be affected with slavery south of the Ohio River in 1790.[5]

"Virginia, it is well known, in the year 1784, ceded to the United States then united only by the original Articles of Confederation her vast possessions northwest of the Ohio, from which the great States of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota, have since been formed. In 1787 before the adoption of the Federal Constitution the celebrated "Ordinance" for the government of this Northwestern Territory was adopted by the Congress, with the full consent, and indeed at the express instance, of Virginia. This Ordinance included six definite "Articles of compact between the original States and the people and States in the said Territory," which were to "for ever remain unalterable unless by common consent." The sixth of these articles ordains that "there shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said Territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."[6]

Article VI required fugitive slaves to be returned, giving slave owners unprecedented support not previously available.[7]

Definition of the Midwest as a region

The Northwest Ordinance, along with the Land Ordinance of 1785, laid the legal and cultural groundwork for midwestern (and subsequently, western) development. Significantly, the free state legal philosophies of both Abraham Lincoln and Salmon P. Chase (Chief Justice, Senator, and early Ohio law author) were derived from the Northwest Ordinance.

Effects on Native Americans

In two articles, the Northwest Ordinance mentions the Native Americans within this region:

"The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity, shall from time to time be made for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship with them."[8]

This section became more of a nominal provision than a real one, as in an earlier section, it assumes that:

"...the governor shall make proper divisions thereof... to lay out the parts of the district in which the Indian titles shall have been extinguished, into counties and townships."[9]

Many American Indians in Ohio, who were not parties, refused to acknowledge treaties signed after the Revolutionary War that ceded lands north of the Ohio River inhabited by them to the United States. In a conflict sometimes known as the Northwest Indian War, Blue Jacket of the Shawnees and Little Turtle of the Miamis formed a confederation to stop white expropriation of the territory. After the Indian confederation had killed more than 800 soldiers in two battles — the worst defeats ever suffered by the U.S. at the hands of the Indians — President Washington assigned General Anthony Wayne command of a new army, which eventually defeated the confederation and thus allowed whites to continue settling the territory.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Hubbard, Bill, Jr. (2009). American Boundaries: the Nation, the States, the Rectangular Survey. University of Chicago Press. pp. 46–47, 114. ISBN 978-0-226-35591-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Chardavoyne, David G. (2006). "The Northwest Ordinance and Michigan's Territorial Heritage". In Finkelman, Paul; Hershock, Martin J. (eds.). The history of Michigan law. Ohio University Press series on law, society, and politics in the Midwest. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. ISBN 9780821416617. OCLC 65205057. Its provisions established a structure of government that encouraged settlement of that vast region and provided those settlers a startling set of civil rights that presaged the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp
  4. ^ Evading the Ordinance: The Persistence of Bondage in Indiana and Illinois|Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 9, No. 1 (Spring, 1989)|, pp. 21
  5. ^ Student's guide to landmark congressional laws on civil rights|Paul Finkelman| Marcus D. Pohlmann, Linda Vallar Whisenhunt| Greenwood Press, 2002|, pp. 14-15
  6. ^ Davis, Jefferson. ["The Rise and Fall of the confederate Government.] Volume I, page 7.
  7. ^ Slavery and the Northwest Ordinance: A Study in Ambiguity| Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter, 1986)|, pp. 345
  8. ^ http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=8&page=transcript Transcript of the Northwest Ordinance - 1787. An Ordinance for the government of the Territory of the United States northwest of the River Ohio. Section 14, Article 3. Retrieved December 12, 2010
  9. ^ http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=8&page=transcript Northwest Ordinance - 1787: An Ordinance for the government of the Territory of the United States northwest of the River Ohio. Retrieve December 12, 2010.