Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AgFunder
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 01:15, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AgFunder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability? I see nothing about this online. Article also seems to have a COI issue. TheAwesomeHwyh (talk) 20:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh (talk) 20:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh (talk) 20:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh (talk) 20:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Disclosure: Another editor asked about this article at the WP:Teahouse. After conducting a WP:BEFORE I advised the editor that while I didn't believe it met CSD:G11 criteria (which was a route suggested by another editor), the subject of the article, in my opinion, did not meet WP:GNG. As a result, I gave the editor advice on available deletion options. I am not able to locate WP:RS coverage on the subject of the article for it to pass WP:ORGDEPTH. Orville1974 (talk) 23:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.