Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Ishaq (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Ishaq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PR for a non-notable CEO of a non-notable company, none of the listed sources are both in-depth and substantial for establishing his own actual notability. Considering this was speedied before, it's better this be taken to AfD as a G4 precaution. SwisterTwister talk 17:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not appear to meet WP:GNG. ubiquity (talk) 18:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG .Awards are also not notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- entirely promotional; sources are insufficient to pass GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. The article could be rewritten so it's not promotional, so I'm disinclined to delete on that alone, but he still wouldn't be notable. Smartyllama (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.