Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CCG Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CCG Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(FASTER Asset Solutions: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero secondary independent sources, and no reliable sources at all currently listed in the article. Article has already been nominated for PROD but no new sources have emerged as a result. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete Couldn't find anything to help with notability either. Kind of seems like a low key advert anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have added a second find-sources above for the company's current name. AllyD (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Searches are not finding WP:RS sources to verify the product claims in the article, nor more generally to indicate that the company is notable under its former or current name. AllyD (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.