Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Maquieira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Maquieira

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player does not qualify for WP:NRU (Major League Rugby is not a notable league under WP:NRU), only brief mentions and new of him signing for sides so does not qualify for WP:GNG either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2019-07 ✍️ create

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a very well written article but unfortunately the subject doesn't pass GNG. As mentioned above, the sources provide nothing more than passing mentions and routine reports of signing for a new club Spiderone 12:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with Spiderone - this fails WP:GNG due to the fact he wasn't significantly covered in places and the other sources aren't reliable/independent. SportingFlyer T·C 15:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.