Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government of Rwanda in Exile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Government of Rwanda in Exile

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation: presumably recognised by no official bodies (as shown by the sources here- self-published press-releases). This is the news resul for "Government of Rwanda in Exile" and this is the result for ["Exiled Government of Rwanda"; a few more hits, but they are mostly regarding the individuals themselves, as individual exiles. Calling them a 'government in exile' is efectively WP:SOAPBOX, certainly WP:OR and by it's very nature WP:PARTISAN. Non-notable subject article, but an object-lesson in what Wikipedia is WP:NOT. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 13:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--They have typically managed to bypass WP:CSD but it will not be prudent to accord them anything more than their their deserved(??) 7 days of WP fame!Winged Blades^Godric 13:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Ishema Party, the parent organization and tag the resultant redirect as {{R from non-neutral}}. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, or if you insist, merge as suggested. Bearian (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect, merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not sure that the suggestion that the Ishema Party is synonymous with the Rwandan govt in exile isn't misplaced- third party, independent sources rarely support the view, and they appear to have no international recognition. It would, I think, be pushing a WP:POV to equate the concept with the body. — O Fortuna^{velut luna} 09:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.