Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazelhurst Regional Gallery and Arts Centre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hazelhurst Regional Gallery and Arts Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:ORG. no real evidence of notability. Google news search indicates hardly any third party coverage. Michellecrisp (talk) 02:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No multiple, independent reliable sources to establish notability. WWGB (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or userfy to me and I'll clean up when I have time there are some book mentions and enough about its exhibits form which to write a sourced article. It needs to be cleaned up but I'm busy with work and about to head off on holidays. I won't be here when this closes so if it closes as delete, I ask the closer to please userfy to me and leave me a note and I'll work on it un userspace. StarM 03:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - satisfies guidelines outlined at ORG. Reliables sources give references to major exhibitions by notable artists, it is listed on international directories to important galleries, and has a nationally recognised profile as the region's Arts centre. Notability is easily established by the sites linked by google, the engines 'results' of "hardly any" is an erroneous and insufficient basis for an AfD. cygnis insignis 08:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.