Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermine E. Kleinert
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 06:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hermine E. Kleinert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Sources include accession records of papers and photographs in various collections. Others are catalogues where pieces have been exhibited. Certainly she appears to have been an artist competent enough to have some paintings exhibited. Beyond that the notability trail goes cold. Fails WP:ARTIST. Velella Velella Talk 19:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Weak keep for now. Apparently very little is known about her. If anything, her most important achievement appears to be exhibiting at the 1913 Armory Show. --Vexations (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep She also showed her work at the Whitney Museum's 3rd Biennial. Going through Google Books shows a number of hits, but I can't access them. I found some information, however, to add to the article and did some cleanup. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:04, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep no reason to delete this. The sources prove she was notable at the time.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.