Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hypography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article seems curiously split between defining "hypography" as a word in its own right, and detailing a website/forum called Hypography.com - apparently the former has simply sprung from the latter, not the other way around. As a word it appears to be a neologism with little evidence of falling into use outside the website in question, and as a website it doesn't appear to pass WP:WEB; I could find only a couple of very brief third-party reviews of the site ([1] [2]). ~Matticus UC 09:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a thinly veiled advertisement for the website mentioned in the article, disguised as WP:NEO. Yngvarr (c) 10:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - For the reason outlined above. Doesn't appear to have notability since the definition is largely internal and seemingly only promotes the website in question. WilliamH (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's a Trojan neologism! --Pmedema (talk) 16:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is non-notable per WP:WEB. Gary King (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Concur with editors above, having perused the article. It's something that doesn't belong here, disguised as something else that doesn't belong here. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 20:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.