Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Cone Rule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Chetblong^Talk_Sign 02:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

International Cone Rule

AfD from former prod. So: Obvious hoax and something made up in school one day. It's been warned about before. Crystallina (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete G3 per nom, comes up as a hoax to me given total lack of sources found in a search. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend salting it as well. Justin Eiler (talk) 02:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per Dlohwhatchamacallit's decline of the speedy. I, too, see no verifiabilty or notability, and although I don't quite agree with the removal of the speedy tag, I say let it go, since this seems to have been made up in school one day. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. However, I am not speedy deleting as this was de-prodded by an admin. My suggestion would be to allow a consensus to develop. Having said that, I see no verifiability or notability. Dloh cierekim 02:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - to add to the concensus that is developing, reasons as above. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. "Club teams and professional teams" don't use goals made of cones - they use goalposts. Zetawoof_(ζ) 05:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NEO and, the whole article comes directly from here. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrong way around. Answers.com is a Wikipedia mirror. Zetawoof_(ζ) 07:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And a fine one at that. Dloh cierekim 14:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Dreamspy (talk) 09:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete made up in school one day, and admittedly so. DarkAudit (talk) 12:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt until such time as a genuine "International Cone Rule" is agreed upon. Sheffield Steel^talk_stalk 20:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.