Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Blumin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Skylight Group. czar 05:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Blumin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article fails WP:GNG. Reads like an advert for an entrepreneur, uses bare URL's to link to trade mags and blogs, after 2 years of editing, no quality non trade references. Tenuous notability. Completely fails WP:BIO. Well written advertising article. Of the five references, two don't work, one is a blog, showing no clear ownership. Primary context is her and the Skylight Group, so no standalone existence outside of it. Previous Afd voted no consensus via two SPA accounts that came in, and have not edited since. scope_creep (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clear advertising with WP:NOT policy applying by that alone, and thus nothing to suggest tolerating it when it's such blatancy. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.